Look, UK, your getting a good deal here. You'll actually get MORE bases and MORE oil by accepting. As well, the people of Iraq will live in much better conditions. Literally everyone wins.
Iraq is not now and has not ever been a native land of the Turks. It is an Arab state and you had literally no casus belli when invading them. Even if you did, you didn't present it to the UNSC to approve, and as a result your actions violate international law. You should not expect anything out of the war but an unconditional surrender, and you're absolutely ludicrous to demand territory.
off to a good start You invaded a sovereign nation, it is our job as the UN to put and end to that, not assist you As a permanent member of the UN security council if I veto something it does not pass, guess what I'm about to do. My arrogance? Your blindly charging into nations and demanding our support in your aggression. Is this a bribe?
And i believe its ludicrous for the US to go straight to nukes if there is foriegn military intervention in Korea.
Insults are not taken lightly or forgotten. And i got you there (chuckles to self, even though noone chuckles anymore)
The United States talks of violating international law - What of your threats to use nuclear weapons on the DPRK? Such an attack would serve only to harm civilians, and is nothing more than blatant terrorism. The Soviet Union, it's allies, as well as observer countries have all expressed their outrage at your brutal intervention against the Korean people, and we have suggested peace negotiations. We have also made clear that we will force North-Korea to stand down, if so needed. Tell me, would you still intervene in this conflict if victory served no gains for your alliance?
There has been no use of nuclear weapons in North Korea. They are ready to be used in the case of outside intervention, against military forces. Clearly I won't be launching nukes in the heart of Korea when my allies and I have soldiers there. Nevertheless, if the Soviet Union has the capacity to force North Korea to stand down, then why haven't you?
Now now, let's calm this down. I'm sure Turkey means no harm to you UK, neither do I in Iran. However, if we take a hostile attitude then we'll have hostile actions and hostile actions mean deaths that could have been prevented. Now, Turkey believes that there is no such thing as Iraq. That is an ex-colonial state and that it was taken from them after the Ottoman Break-up. I presume we can all see why they would think this. Now, the UK (as I see it) believes that Iraq is a sovereign nation and thus should not be attacked without good reason. I presume we can hey wee why they would think this as well. But, both Turkey and I would adamantly approve of being allowed to go forth with this, and as we empathize with your situation, we are willing to do many things for you. And in fact, we already have by preserving your oil trade (something you brought up earlier) and leasing you a major port for a very long period of time. I hope you too will empathize and see where we come from, UK. Clearly you can see we will try to do many things to please you, and we are ever open to other solutions that perhaps we can both agree to.
But seriously, you've threatened to use Nukes on North Korea, even while they are getting pushed back according to the latest UN reports? And you tell me that I couldn't go into Iraq (the reason was because in the 1950's Iraq was in utter Turmoil. And had just recently lost its British chains (or so I believe i heard)). Our offer is only belligerent in the sense that, yes Iraq will be partitioned, but oil will still go to the UK and the UN. As for the UK, what is you're REAL reason behind the protection of Iraq? *Cough Oil *Cough
Im gonna turn this very simple.(just a suggestion) Trade one country for another. one side gets Korea the other gets Iraq. (this will probably be rejected but its worth a shot)
You clearly have no care for international law, Turkey. You don't get to just invade whomever you want for whatever cockamamie reason you want. And you certainly don't get to dissolve a sovereign state because of it.
*I should also add the reason that I invaded Iraq to preserve the order and restore peaceful Turkish rule. EDIT: So if I just accept you're peace terms, you do realize that it could have repercussions? And how long will Iraq have to stay under supposed European Rules then? Another decade before the UK lets em off the leash before some dictator grabs power?
Basically the same thing? What you think we will just outright kill all who resist Turkish return? Maybe rehabilitation, but not arrest.
Fair enough. Just make sure not to back stab me. Bailing out Belgium was more for historical than strategic reasons. W. Germany and bank-riddled Switzerland interested me a little more.
You even openly admit that your goal was and is to conquer Iraq. Unbelievable; I would expect nothing less from reds.
