70th Anniversary of the Pearl Harbor Attack.

Discussion in 'Historical Events Coffee House' started by Vassilli1942, Dec 7, 2011.

  1. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The thing is that Japan didn't declare war. No matter what meta nonsense happened, Japan attacked us without declaring war. That's not okay, and that's why it's a big deal.
  2. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    I don't understand why Americans are so quick to denounce Japan for not declaring war when they haven't formally declared war on anybody since the Korean War, which would make all of their wars from 1950 a 'big deal'. In Japan's defense, it was their only real way to declare it without getting completely decimated.
  3. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Declaring war is only possible when you're engaging in war.

    War is a state on state affair, and despite the nominal status of things like the "War on Terror" or "War on Drugs" we are not actually at war. Japan engaged in state-state conflict with the obvious intention of going to war with the United States, but did not declare it until after they had attacked us. It's ridiculous to compare what Japan did with what we do today.
  4. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    I see what you're saying, but look at it from Tojo's point of view, f they declared war before hand then their surprise attack would have failed, and defeat would have been sure from the start. It was the only way they could have a fighting chance. And so what if they broke the rules of war, it's not like it's stopped them before, and what are the Americans going to do about it? Declare a war? Well, yeah, that's the idea.

    But yeah, that's the Japanese point of view.
  5. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know why they did it, but that doesn't make it any less terrible for us. My point was that Toast's nonsense about Americans whining over it is ridiculous, as we have every right to make a big deal out of it.
  6. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    Well, maybe not in the modern day, I mean come on, get over it.
  7. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    Iraq? Afghanistan? Maybe?

    If Japan did declare war before they attacked Pearl Harbor, they would have been crushed. Simple as that.
  8. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    Those aren't wars against states. Their conflicts with organizations overseas.
  9. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    The Invasion of Iraq certainly was.
  10. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We are not at war with Iraq nor are we at war with Afghanistan. We are in fact allied in our current armed conflict with both of them, and render significant military aid to both of them.

    That doesn't mean that we're going to ignore that they broke the rules of war, or that we're whiners for pointing that out. Japan was in the wrong here, very clearly.
  11. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    I'm talking about 2003, with the whole issue with Saddam Hussein. Instead of Afghanistan, I could put forth North Vietnam instead.

    Yes. That doesn't mean you have to be so passionate about it more than 70 years after it. It was a great surprise attack and it will be remembered as that.
  12. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    I don't know man, when you think about it, who really won WWII? I mean the Empire of Japan still exists, and we never invaded them. Is it possible that they are the true victors?
  13. Vassilli1942 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Long Island, NY USA
    The attack was planed to start 30 minutes after Japan had informed the United States that peace negotiations were at an end, but the attack began before the notice could be delivered.
  14. Bart (Moderator) NKVD Channel Maintainer

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    294
    Location:
    Nootdorp, The Netherlands
    The word 'war' has no meaning if you attack people without warning. But why would you first want to warn people? Also, I heard the Japanese tried to declare war a few minutes before the attack, but that got messed up for some reason.
  15. Viking Socrates I am Mad Scientist

    Member Since:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    9,153
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    In a cave,watching shadows (Plato reference)
    Claim your sources, it's about an official deceleration of war which the Japanese did not do.
  16. Bart (Moderator) NKVD Channel Maintainer

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    294
    Location:
    Nootdorp, The Netherlands
    I heard. I don't have a source, and therefor it's not a valid argument. I just stated that that could be a possibility.
  17. The Evil Major Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    552
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    King's Landing
    Tennoheika banzai!!! 天皇陛下万歳!!!

    Yamamoto was a military genius, one of the best Japan ever had, and one of the best naval warfare theorists at the time.
  18. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    You should be using トラ・トラ・トラ! for the Pearl Harbor attacks. Yamamoto was a clever guy, and he predicted the result of the war after Pearl Harbor and got it spot on. It would have gone a lot better in Japan's favor if the guy was given more say in the attack.
  19. The Evil Major Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    552
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    King's Landing
    Indeed.
    And yeah I know "tora tora tora!" would be more appropriate but "天皇陛下万歳!!!" just sounds better.
  20. Karakoran Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,903
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    Well, we pretty openly said we were going into Iraq on several occasions. And at the time we considered Afghanistan as attacking us in 9/11.

    They could've ordered a diplomat in Washington to tell them the declaration of war 10 minutes beforehand. It's still a dick move, but it wouldn't compromise the sneak attack.

Share This Page

Facebook: