You know, a WW1 shooter is a bad idea if you have any knowledge of WW1. It wouldn't even make for a good strategy game. It's either going to be ridiculously exaggerated or just plain boring.
Yes I know World War I history and yes the War for the most part war a very static with trench warfare but that was mostly on the western front. The war on the Eastern and Middle Eastern fronts were more mobile. Also mountain warfare existed on the Italian front. There was also amphibious landings during the Gallipoli campaign and the attack on Tsingtao by the Japanese. Yes this game only focuses on one battle but if they made a game that used all the diffrent fronts in World War I you mite get a good game.
What I was trying to ponit out is that a World War I game could work because as you stated Can't double post dammit so.....
Well yes, the people that make it are from the US, you can find real years in reviews online, they do this as more of a joke.