Official Transparency: brought to you by me

So a tribune didn't support from what I assume the masses want.........*sigh* as expected, and I take your word that Ler did post and did delete the post using his moderation powers, however since there is no way to accurately prove this to me (as stated) I can not blame Ler as this is based only off of the mod's words. However from the looks of it, It appears you right.

I am not apologizing for him as I don't feel he's done anything to apologize for, I am defending him.

Exposing a cover up (a cover up of opposition to TRANSPARENCY for goodness' sake) by a Tribune in a thread about the success of a proposal to actually foster transparency: totally irrelevant hogwash.

Read Chelsea. She says that Ler was for a different methed of Transparency. That right there, from someone who isn't completely hateful of Comrade Ler? Worth more then Ronald Raygun and Kali's word together.

And Ler has a history of doing ridiculous bullshit, like trying to get Kali's mod status removed for something as mundane as being an "anti-communist". It's only natural that Kali isn't very keen on him.
Why anyone is still supportive of Ler is beyond me, it should be clear that he isn't the most stable and trustworthy individual around.

Again. Go make a thread about how there was a cover up, etc. Elsewhere. I can just repeat what i said in your quote of me, it pretty much sums up my reply to this.

Please tell me you are joking, no for the love of all that is holy tell me so.

And you are?

That's what apologizing means.

@Skyicewolf
No one is disputing that Ler supported 'tribunal transparency.' The post he made in that topic is noteworthy because he directly opposed the proposal and then deleted the post when it became apparent that the proposal would pass and his opposition would become public.

Bronze will work, if only under the condition that my genitalia is outlined in gold. Gotta make it stand out.

You've managed to contradict yourself in a single post, good work

Again, make a thread about it, then put all your evidence out. Your word is, again, worth a grain of salt.

Yes, I did delete my post. I haven't denied that at all. But Jesus man, put it in perspective.

Nope, but I admit it and do it for the lolz. Also I have never broken any rules.

Once again just check the first page. Ler may have deleted his post but he basically put his idea back up. His post is out there, any further attacks on him are hardly necessary.

Pretty much it goes like this

Mods "Blah blah blah Here is this idea"
Ler "Oh here is this idea that directly opposes that proposal"
Mods " Blah lets pass this idea"
Ler "Oh fuck now people will see my idea and dislike me *delete idea*"
Mods "Bad ler, very bad ler"
Ler " ITS BECAUSE IM A COMMUNIST ISN'T IT"

or I could be wrong, and both sides are idiots.....

Then don't go around saying other people aren't.

Have you listened to a single word said in this? All you've demonstrated by writing this little dialogue is how you only listen to Kali. And not a single person else?

@Skyicewolf
There, Ler has admitted that he deleted the post. No more crazy conspiracy ranting.

Explain where and how.

"I deleted my post for exactly this reason - Because I was certain Kali would try to twist it around to make me look bad." - ComradeLer

My God people, imagine this kind of statement emerging from any elected representative in the world, ever. Now ask yourself why the Hell it's perfectly okay for Ler to do this. It's blatant, unabashed political corruption. I mean honestly, you cannot find a more clear cut case of unethical conduct and abuse of power to influence public opinion on the behalf of an elected official.