Failed US Constitutional Amendments

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Vassilli1942, Jan 28, 2012.

  1. Vassilli1942 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Long Island, NY USA
    Not sure if this should be in the political section or not so I'm just going to put it here.
    Now this a list from a book given to me by my 12th grade AP US Government teacher called "The US Constitution And Fascinating Facts About It" The following is a limited list of some of the propsed amendments that never left the halls of Congree.
    1876: An attempt to abolish the US Senate.
    1876: The forbidding of religious leaders from occupying a governmental office or receiving federal funding.
    1878: An Executive Council of three to replace the office of President.
    1893: Renaming this nation the "United States of the Earth".
    1893: Abolishing the US Army and Navy
    1894: Acknowledging that the Constitution recognize God and Jesus Chirst as the supreme authorities in human affairs
    1912: Making marriage between races illegal
    1914: Finding divorce to be illegal
    1916: All acts of war should be put to a national vote. Anyone voting yes had to register as a volunteer for service in the US Army.
    1933: An attempt to limit personal wealth to $1 million.
    1947: The income tax maximum for an individual should not exceed 25%
    1948: The right of Citizens to segregate themselves from others.
    1971: Americans citizens should have the unalienable right to an environment free of pollution.
  2. Imperial1917 City-States God of War

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,032
    Likes Received:
    621
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Some of these are just ridiculous. Some actually sound not-too-bad.
    Take the 1947 one. That is kind of umm... LOWER than what alot of American citizens pay in income tax already.
  3. Vassilli1942 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Long Island, NY USA
    Thats why they never became Amendments.
  4. pedro3131 Running the Show While the Big Guy's Gone

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Bear in mind this isn't a comprehensive list. There's been 2 or 3 proposed in this congressional term, but they're all pretty reasonable.

    Fun fact, the bill or rights originally had 12 amendments, one of which was passed in the 1970's or 80's
    Imperial1917 likes this.
  5. Imperial1917 City-States God of War

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,032
    Likes Received:
    621
    Trophy Points:
    183
    And the others?

    Though, in retrospect, some of them are not so much ridiculous as impractical to impliment. Though the 25% one SEEMS good, it would hamper the US ability in proportional taxing, which is all the craze now thanks to Buffet.
  6. Vassilli1942 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Long Island, NY USA
    That is true the book I'm getting this info from dosen't list every proposed amendment. Also what were the two amendments that didn't make it into the bill of rights?
    What others? Also I agree some on the list don't sound that bad or ridiculous.
  7. pedro3131 Running the Show While the Big Guy's Gone

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
  8. Viking Socrates I am Mad Scientist

    Member Since:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    9,153
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Trophy Points:
    248
    Location:
    In a cave,watching shadows (Plato reference)
    1894: Acknowledging that the Constitution recognize God and Jesus Chirst as the supreme authorities in human affairs

    Yeah fuck separation of church and state.
  9. 0bserver92 Grand King of Moderation

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,746
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Canada
    I like 1916, 1933, and 1971.
  10. Imperial1917 City-States God of War

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,032
    Likes Received:
    621
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Not to pick at people, but:

    1916 would violate people's right to a closed vote. That is, people have the right to keep secret what they voted. The U.S. makes use of the secret ballot for a reason, you know. Or the 'Australian ballot' as they call it.

    1933 is just ridiculous. Limiting the ceiling of wealth would severly hamper the economy. Why would I want to live in a place that is Capitalist that limits the extent to which I can gather my wealth? And for that matter, what right does the government have to tell me what to do with my money? Plus, the Amendments are for protecting the individual, not limiting it.

    I have no idea what 1971 is talking about. I have the feeling that the OP misprinted it. Can someone clarify?
  11. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    THe United States of the Earth sounds badass.
    TheKoreanPoet and Sparticus 1244 like this.
  12. Imperial1917 City-States God of War

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,032
    Likes Received:
    621
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Yeah... no
    That would be a terrible, terrible name. You don't see the UN being called 'THe United States of the Earth' do you?
    NO. They call it the United Nations, which still somehow manages to maintain some level of respectability to the title name despite all that has happened.

    Come to think of it... not alot of futuristic Space Earths with non-facist-sounding titles, huh?
    The Federation
    The Imperium
    The Systems Alliance
    The United Nations Space Command [which is, for all intents and purposes, not so cheery]
  13. Spartacus Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    973
    Likes Received:
    391
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    It still sounds badass.
  14. Imperial1917 City-States God of War

    Member Since:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,032
    Likes Received:
    621
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Yeah... no.
    I would still take any of the science-fiction facist names over "THe United States of the Earth".
  15. pedro3131 Running the Show While the Big Guy's Gone

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Prob meant to say inalienable... In any case, I don't really think that we have a right to a closed vote, generally elections are left up to the states. I could do some more research, but I'm pretty sure that even we have developed such a right through jurisprudence, it would have been prior to 1916, and a constitutional amendment would supersede it and replace the precedent. Keep in mind this was introduced during a period in our nations history when we were debating joining world war 1, which was pretty strongly opposed for a long time. It's similar to how nowadays we criticize politicians for sending the young men of our country off to war, when more often then not their own children sit safely at home.
  16. battleearl Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    143
    I'm glad most of these proposals never became reality. Most of them sound pretty silly and even funny. I can kinda understand the good intentions behind some of them. But why did they want to abolish the US army and Navy?

    Edit: And isn't the United States of the Earth the name of the country that consists of the entire world in Futurama?
  17. Vassilli1942 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Long Island, NY USA
    Pretty much it's just the idea that a person as the right to live a pollution free environment.
  18. LeonTrotsky Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    As I recall, closed voting became an issue around the turn of the century. The Populists wanted that Amendment, right?
  19. battleearl Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,467
    Likes Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Who proposed this one?
  20. Vassilli1942 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    509
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Long Island, NY USA
    I really don't know, all the book dose is give you proposed Amendment and the year, but thats a pretty bad one have they hered of speration of church and state.

Share This Page

Facebook: