Difference between original Nazis in the 30s to the Neo-Nazis of today?

Tell me. What makes the national socialists of Germany in the 30s different to those that are called neo-Nazis today?

The real national socialists were Germanic, whereas today you've got Anglo-Saxon neo-Nazis usually skinheads that have tattoos on them. Normally I would consider the original Nazis to be intelligent compared to the neo-Nazis of today. It's the stereotypical assumption now that all neo-Nazis that follow the political correctness are stupid and ignorant. Neo-Nazis of today haven't got the slightest clue about their ideology, only in their image they picture Hitler and the Swastika, nothing else that involves intellectual studying of their ideology they follow.

What am I to complain about them, at least their not a threat that much, but aren't we all glad though. America has a lot of retards that follow national socialism in their country, basically applying the Germanic form of national socialism, but obviously replacing the Germanic identity of the thesis to the Anglo-Saxon race, apply the ideology in their country. Yes, the national socialism movement of the US uses the 25 point thesis by Adolf Hitler only to make certain changes to it.

Can't this bloody people just put down their ideology and follow something that is traditional and convenient in their country. National socialism was a Germanic form of fascism which could only be applied in German speaking nations at the time. The ideology of fascism has different ethnicity such as Mosley's fascists which was British fascism. Italian fascism where fascism first originated from. This people that follow national socialism now are dumb and have absolute no clue whatsoever of their ideology. Where is blazer123 when you need him.

Give me your views on this, please.


American neo-national socialist movement compared to the original national socialists of Germany.

The difference is that the real Nazis were a serious highly organized political and genocidal threat with many supporting their cause and who aspired to have blonde hair, while the Neo Nazis are just bald racist punks for the most part.

Can't tell if this is a bad attempt at whiteknighting or holier than thou fascist rivalry.

• Real nazis knew how to dress nicely and act like a nice person. Neo nazis are just a bunch of rag-tag hooligens.

The real Nazis were the head of a country, highly organized political and Military machine that conquered almost all of Europe and committed mass genocide. The Neo Nazis are a racist group of people, that hate the Jews and other ethnic groups.

In my narrowminded opinion there all dirty skinheads, except for the original nazis they had genocidal ideologies.

Nazi's at least had "SOME"( I can't put enough emphasis on "SOME") slightly good, if misguided, ideas.

It's opposite political week so he is exploring his political views.

The real Nazis unlike Neo Nazis were intelligent, but alsoo genocidal.

This clip seems related... or not.

Actually they were pretty stupid. Germany was in a key position to gain large tracts of land(Austria, Sudentenland, Memel and eventually Danzig) through diplomatic/non-agreesive actions.(such as plebiscites and referendums) The Nazis threw it all away with their "world conquest/domination" attitude. They started out alright with Anschluss, but that could easily have happened under a Liberal or Social-Democrat government and thus was no real achievement of Nazism as much as Pan-Germanism.

The difference is that the real Nazis were like every super villain in the history of all media. The Neo-Nazis are like the comic relief.

Original nazi's were led to believe that they will be kings of the world if they do all the things Hitler wanted them to do.But Neos are just racist shit-for-brain skinheads who think being a racist equals being a nazi.

The original Nazis, gave us fantasy about dead hot women in SS uniforms. Neo-Nazis, are a bunch of coked up skanks you don't want to fuck.

For some reason I feel our good friend SovietEmpireUSSR already knew the answer to this question.
Maybe this whole thing is a communist plot to get us to say that the 'proper' Nazis were great. But then in comparison to Neo-Nazis, they are. At the risk of sounding like a pedantic dictionary-obsessed jerk, the key word here is 'neo'.

The main difference is the Neo-Nazis of today mainly just preach hate against various group of people. They have little to no desire to deal with things like the economy or military, the just want so called "undesirables" gone. Hitler's Nazis at least had thoughts on how every aspect of the country should be run. They didn't just preach intolerance, nit that that excuses the intolerance they did preach.

I personally love it when Russians call Hitler a great leader and fly national socialist flags, the irony.

You gotta love irony.

The neo-Nazis in Russia are confused and they hold no clue whatsoever about Hitler and his plan to wipe out the Slavic race. I do remember something in vain about mentioning that the Slavic's were either going to get wiped out by the Nazis or kept as slaves for the Third Reich if Lebensraum was to turn out to be successful which fortunately never happened. (The information gathered from Mein Kampf)



Ever heard of the National Bolshevik party/movement?

Actually, the Neo-nazis of Russia know about Hitler´s anti-slavism. They just adapted the ideology into a Russian form of nazism, which defends slavic supremacy, ignoring aryanism.

The National Bolshevik Party is basically a mixture of Stalinism with Nazism.

You also need to understand that there are also communist here in this country and other
extremist. As for originality we have had a lot of social Darwinism and KKK in our history {or at least a
fair amount according to my textbook}.