Josef Stalin Declassified

Discussion in 'Historical Events Coffee House' started by slydessertfox, Mar 16, 2012.

  1. BattalionOfRed Mr. Fred Battaliono

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,793
    Likes Received:
    563
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Well, yes, I was born after Stalin died (I'm not that old, alright buddy?) and all I've seen discussions of is absolute garbage, post Cold War stuff, or just comparative statistics which make no point and are only for the purposes of saying "Well, that guy is inherently evil, but this fucker killed more!"

    I don't want to be angry at this for no reason, so, I'm not watching it.
  2. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    I do have respect for Churchill, but it still pisses me off how people criticize one over something, but turn a blind eye to another for the same issue.

    Also claim that UK & USSR were not allies is wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_Treaty_of_1942 & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_Agreement

    He was a smart mad man in my opinion, not a fan per say by I do see why people like him.
  3. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    I don't get it. Are you still talking about Stalin? What did Churchill do wrong? Explain.

    You honestly think the UK and the Russians were on a good standing after WW2? The only reason the UK were willing to co-operate with the Russians in the first place was to relieve pressure from bombing raids. We quite literally used the USSR. As for a military and political alliance, that was nothing but a scrap of paper. There were high tensions between the UK and the USSR after WW2 and they were far from being allies.

    Churchill? A "smart mad man"? Why is he a "mad man"? I don't see anything mad about him. Perhaps a very lazy smart man.
    slydessertfox likes this.
  4. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    You don't make no sense

    What a pathetic way to admit defeat


    He planned Operation unthinkable, invasion of USSR. Do I have to explain the insanity of the idea expecially when Brits are doing it?
  5. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    How was Operation Unthinkable mad in any way? The idea of another war against the Russians was all to real following world war two. And they simply wanted to be prepared for the worst.

    Also, do you realize that you are comparing The Holodomor to Operation Unthinkable in an attempt to make the former seem not as bad?
    slydessertfox likes this.
  6. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Shitty & bankrupt British "army" is going to invade the Russian colossus? Not gonna happen. Jerry's got slaughtered and so would the Brits. Also backstabbing an ally after a devastating war is beyond covardly thing to do.

    Preparing for the worst is not invading another country. This plan was intended not to defend, but to attack. (Meaning UK would be the aggressor, this was not made because USSR would attack, they has their separate plans)
  7. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    D3adtrap, why are you so obsessed with the USSR after they tried to rape Finland?
  8. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    @D3adtrap
    By my understanding Operation Unthinkable was concieved to be implemented in the event of Soviet takeover of their captured territories. But you're correct, following the conclusion of the war, Soviet Forces outnumbered western allied forces three to one. The plan relied on a quick surprise attack as well as measures to defend the British Isles. But as unfeasible as it was, it does not justify the holodomor and definitely does not equivocate Churchill to Stalin.
    sirdust likes this.
  9. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    I like history > I like WW2 > I like eastern front > I like Soviet red army

    That is not to say I like USSR, it's policy and what ever and after I've studied them allot and they are not the buggy man they seem to be to everyone else.

    Out numbered and out gunned, my friend. Not only in quantity but in quality. (With exception of Navy)

    When Germans invaded they out numbered USSR (at the front lines) aprox. 4 to 1, they had element of surprise, much superior forces in every way at the time and yet they failed miserably. Now USSR is stronger than ever, thought of British invasion is quite laughable.

    Not no Churchill is by no means anywhere close to Stalin.
  10. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    And when you studied the Soviet Union and discovered that they are not the buggy man that they seem to be to everyone else, were you convinced by somebody telling you that the holodomor was okay because churchill drew up an unfeasibe military plan? No? Then why are you doing it now?
  11. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    Stalin was a criminal. He was a mass genocider, even more than Hitler. He made himself look as though he was a hero to the Russian people when in fact he was the opposite.
  12. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    First you have to prove that it was a man made famine. Historians are divided by this issue and I for one cannot possibly blame Stalin for the famine.

    I dare you to argue for that statement, I dare you.
  13. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    This just gets better than better.

    Stalin did not commit genocide. Case closed. I don't even know why I'm arguing with a 13 year old American kid who thinks that "genocider" is a word.
    The Shaw likes this.
  14. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    I don't give a damn about the famine honestly. I just wonder why you brought Churchill and Operation Unthinkable into this.
  15. BattalionOfRed Mr. Fred Battaliono

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,793
    Likes Received:
    563
    Trophy Points:
    188

    Lots of people tend to think that way, but I notice all too often people shitting all over the Communism and the Soviets and not doing so much as take half of an hour to read about it and learn what it is. Instead, they follow through with whatever is patriotic and humble of them to a particular allegiance.

    Prime example?
    D3adtrap likes this.
  16. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    This
    And that's even worse, when people don't even know what they're talking about. I don't mind people having different opinion, quite the opposite actually, but I cannot respect them if they are claiming something and have nothing to back it up with.
  17. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    Actually Genocider is a word, but not in the way I used it. Yes, Stalin commited genocide. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_did_Stalin_kill
    http://www.enotes.com/stalin-joseph-reference/stalin-joseph
    This was even on the History Channel. Plus you weren't even arguing with me on this thread.
  18. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone

    lol

    Stalin didn't commit genocide. He killed a lot of people, but he didn't commit genocide.

    The History Channel is not a real source.
  19. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    Stalin did commit genocide. When you cause Ukraine's famine that is considered genocide.
  20. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Here we go again...
    BattalionOfRed likes this.

Share This Page