Josef Stalin Declassified

Discussion in 'Historical Events Coffee House' started by slydessertfox, Mar 16, 2012.

  1. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    If he did cause the famine in Ukraine, it was to kill people. Not to systematically exterminate all Ukrainians. The Ukrainians just happened to get the wrong end of the stick. That doesn't mean he specifically targeted the Ukrainians.
  2. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    And yet you still have to break the barrier that Stalin actually did cause the famine, which he did not.

    EDIT: Also you have to explain why did not Stalin continue this "genocide" through out his entire reign.
  3. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    The dreadful famine that engulfed Ukraine, the northern Caucasus, and the lower Volga River area in 1932-1933 was the result of Joseph Stalin's policy of forced collectivization. The heaviest losses occurred in Ukraine, which had been the most productive agricultural area of the Soviet Union. Stalin was determined to crush all vestiges of Ukrainian nationalism. Thus, the famine was accompanied by a devastating purge of the Ukrainian intelligentsia and the Ukrainian Communist party itself. The famine broke the peasants' will to resist collectivization and left Ukraine politically, socially, and psychologically traumatized.
    The policy of all-out collectivization instituted by Stalin in 1929 to finance industrialization had a disastrous effect on agricultural productivity. Nevertheless, in 1932 Stalin raised Ukraine's grain procurement quotas by forty-four percent. This meant that there would not be enough grain to feed the peasants, since Soviet law required that no grain from a collective farm could be given to the members of the farm until the government's quota was met. Stalin's decision and the methods used to implement it condemned millions of peasants to death by starvation. Party officials, with the aid of regular troops and secret police units, waged a merciless war of attrition against peasants who refused to give up their grain. Even indispensible seed grain was forcibly confiscated from peasant households. Any man, woman, or child caught taking even a handful of grain from a collective farm could be, and often was, executed or deported. Thosewho did not appear to be starving were often suspected of hoarding grain. Peasants were prevented from leaving their villages by the NKVD and a system of internal passports.
    The death toll from the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine has been estimated between six million and seven million. According to a Soviet author, "Before they died, people often lost their senses and ceased to be human beings." Yet one of Stalin's lieutenants in Ukraine stated in 1933 that the famine was a great success. It showed the peasants "who is the master here. It cost millions of lives, but the collective farm system is here to stay."
    slydessertfox likes this.
  4. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Cool story bro, have anything to add? Maybe something other than copy pasted material?
  5. Daddy92 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    556
    Likes Received:
    122
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Florence,Italy
    ehi i asked if the video that sly posted was PBS(propaganda bullsh++) or if they had something to back that up(about the plan to destroy the west)
  6. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    I was just saying what an article said.
  7. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Relax, that comment was completely unrelated to you.

    In other words what that article contained is all you know about the subject...
    Daddy92 likes this.
  8. Daddy92 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Message Count:
    556
    Likes Received:
    122
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Florence,Italy
    ok no problem with that then anyway only 13 countries consider the Holodomor a genocide planned(or not) by the soviets to attack the ukrainian nationalism.
  9. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
  10. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Are you saying that after famine of 1901, 1906, 1911, WW1 that was during famine and destroyed agricultral land, Russian civil war, single biggest mass murder of domestic animals & burning countless farms had nothing to do with it? When Stalin gets in charge you all of the sudden start blaming him, even tho situation was completely out of his hand. You are so willing to ignore all of these facts and blame Stalin. I cannot compensate the sheer ignorance...

    - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Holodomor
  11. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
  12. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
  13. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    I tried to cross examine his quotes with the wikipedia source and I dont think they were all from wikipedia but I'm probably wrong.
  14. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    I would go with the enyclepedia on this one.
  15. RickPerryLover strawberries oh sweet Jesus strawberries

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Stalin, this is a man who is.... controversial.

    Now don't faint or take this out of context, but he is like George W. Bush. Why, because he may have been bad, but he was the best choice. There was no other leader at the time who could mobilize the USSR and get them marching to victory. However he had the drawback of being a corrupt man who caused one of the greatest holocausts of all time. This just makes it more sad that had anyone but him been chosen worse events would have happened. I relate him to Bush because he was a bad president, but Gore would have been worse. Therefor Bush was the right man at the time to lead. Stalin was the right man at the time to lead.
  16. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    That is IF he is responsible for the famine, which he is not nor was that the worst famine. Under Mao estimated 50-70 million starved.
  17. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    They didn't need Stalin, if he had never come to power the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics would have won a quicker victory.
  18. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Assuming we're talking about Germany, that could be true. I mean USSR had arguably the best spy network of the time and yet Stalin ignored Germans massing on his border. (Even despite deserters coming over) Now would USSR be as strong military vise to face Germany is up for debate...
  19. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    You have to remember the purge of the army. He ordered almost all of the generals of the Soviet Union's military.
  20. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Well yeah and that, but under Stalin some of the most efficient military were made. If we talk about raw firepower of Red Army, it did improve under Stalin, same could not be said about command structure.

Share This Page