Proposal: Holding tribune Members To A Higher Standard

Of course.

If anyone wants to discuss it further, feel free to pm me, I guess.

And while I still feel like the proposal isn't a bad idea, Chelsea brought up a very good point here:

While I don't particularly agree with the "Wait it out for two months", I do agree with the rest.

Yeah I think Chelsea made a good point there. Like I said, I'd be more than willing to scrap the impeachment idea if that is holding people back from supporting this, because the main thing I am really pushing for is trying to get the vice tribunes and removal of tribunes for misconduct.

If the people want to elect somone who abuses powers and doesn't fo there job correctly them its there fault for voting.

It actually is.

Here you go Sly, you can be Master of the Hunt.
Ler, you can be Keeper of the Swans.

Satisfied?

Probably not gonna respond beyond this, but I felt that I should correct myself here, by 'I was the only tribune who did anything' I meant out of myself and Ronald Raygun. Poor choice of words, though I didn't mean any offense to any of the other tribunes.

@Fey - I think you have been an awesome Tribune.

I call dibs on Cupbearer!

Ah, ok, that indeed makes it a lot clearer.

Jeez what am I? Chop liver?

Yes. =P

Poor @Romulus211 . No recognition for his achievements... (or lack thereof)

Incidentally to throw in my 2 cents. I don't agree given that:

1. Tribunes are elected by the members.
2. Tribunes have stricter rules already than the moderators.
3. Tribunes are only temporary.

The reason I supported it for moderators was because of the amount of freedom moderators have as well as their permanent status.

@slydessertfox

Sly...I've already told you through steam that this issue with Ler and Kali is an old fight, you shouldn't put yourself into it. Don't publicly name him on these kinds of threads as that is rude, I'm also not going to support these propositions as well because we don't need any more bureaucracy, the simpler the rules are, the better they work. I say that because that's what happens IRL and I also want people to start taking votes seriously, if you get a bad tribune its the voter's fault, not the rules. Btw you should play CK2 with me whenever you can =P

I agree with this proposal and I would like Ler to not be able to run in this tribune election. Kali made a great point in that last post he made.

Enlighten me because I didn't see one.

Well the idea Tribune forever or Honor Tribune is quite up for debate!

?

I have gone through some threads and looked at what he has posted.

Because he can easily look up his posts on the forums, which is what most people base their opinions of fellow forum members on? While I have talked to a few forum members, none of them actually know me. I don't really see what you're trying to get at here.