Am I an idiot or did Kali's thread get deleted?

Haha I knew it looked like there were too many i's!!

EDIT: Wait, if its Kalalification, doesn't that mean we should be saying Kala instead of Kali?

COME AT ME BITCH
Stalin got a little tongue tied at saying Kali's full name in the podcast, so he just started calling him Kali and it stuck.

I was calling him Kali first.

Way to take credit
I propose we begin calling him Kala now, because he has transformed in my opinion.(Through his actions and whatnot)

Um... you all realize that his posts are still out there, right?
You could easily check the spelling on any number of posts.

Unless they were all deleted in which case it would probably end up looking like I talked and argued with myself for a good 2/3rds of my posts...

No, they are still there. They just show up as posted by a guest with no avatar. Its kinda weird. But his name is still there.

Think about it though. People would think you have a fascinating mind. Or they would think you have a split personality...

Like the guy in fight club!

Don't you do that anyway?

Kidding . Well for the most part anyway

You just broke the first rule.

I've always wanted a new friend!
I'm so lonely...

One of my associates that teaches psychology did a critique on the nature of that...

And the second and the third.

There there.

So can we start calling him Kala as a symbol he has changed from grammar nazi mod to forum "freedom fighter"

Are those not interchangeable?

They are, I assume he just used different words to add flavor to his rhetoric, and it worked. Which is manipulative by itself. Just kidding, its really not even comparable to Kala.

I don't really think basing an election off of one issue is really a smart move. I would hope you make a more in depth campaign than just "I dislike Kali and so do you" haha. In all seriousness though I have respect for Kali, at least the ideas he used to have which struck me as close to Legalistic ideals, maybe I'm wrong. Now it just seems like some highschool drama where this person said this and this person said that. I just don't understand why people start things.

Also wish to point out as other's have this is Stalin's forums, not yours. Nobody ever invented something and then created a business or idea around it and then turns around and asks "Who wants me to run this bitch?" It would be easier to think of the forums as a business with Stalin as owner, creator and CEO of it. The moderators are basically people who make sure the forums run smoothly like other top executives. The only reason, I can guess, the Tribunes even exist is to 1. make the forums more interesting and 2. to give the everday forum users a voice and not to be just ignored. Nobody can make a complaint and when it's denied because there's lack of evidence, a horribly constructed arguement or just plain imbecilic ranting just make a few thousand more threads saying the same exact shit THEN expect to get taken seriously. If you don't like the way someone thinks or how the forum is run from the top...then go away. You can't impeach an emperor.

I would wish for the forums to be run more efficiently and people to refrain from dragging it down in these "this guy is a prick and she's a bitch" arguements. In fact is there someone I can make a formal request to for an addition of double jeapordy and pressumption of innocence rule in here so that certain issues can be resolved and never be brought up again. While mods do a good job of making sure the forums aren't cluttered with spam and no one breaks a rule they can't solve disputes and if they "solve" them they can't stop the large comlaints the forums are full of when one side doesn't get what they want. Also the tribunes being the voice of the people seem to have little power to stop arguements over dead or inconclusive topics. I would hope that there would be a fair impartial judicial or internal affairs system put in place I would request that at least a rule would be set into place to make sure that once there's a decicisive verdict on a subject that it can never be brought up again. If it is brought up again then it is immidiately disregarded and the person who brought up the already solved topic would be immediately discouraged from doing so again.

Also I don't believe Moderators should be chosen for such tasks due to recent events have shown people either suspect or just use as an excuse that Mods are corrupt or at least have bias towards certain members within the forums. I would welcome any criticism and corrections towards my ideas

If this topic has already been made into a thread I would wish someone to forward the link to it so I don't continue to talk of an already thought of idea as my own. Thank you.

No. There are things he said that only fit into the first category, some that only fit into the second, and some that fit into both.

Don't answer for me.

I wasn't answering for you. I was putting in my two sense on what the two words mean. If esac wants to ask you and you only a specific question, he can inbox you, instead of posting it here.

It was a joke. Actually, if you read my campaign speech on the March elections discussions thread, my campaign is very similar to your second paragraph. I endorse the ideas in your 3rd paragraph. As for the 4th, its not just recent events, people have always accused the mods.

Well fuck, sounds like something I would've liked to of read. Twice In one night the staff have gone and put me in a position of darkness.
/assholes