Watch this video, help this father, help Akian

Okay, first of all how in the world did what the people in this thread say make you more conservative? Secondly do you not think death is a bit too extreme for her actions?

I talking to the site in general, when I first joined the site I was some ultra-communism liberal, but as time passes, the time passes I start to hate communism, and I just say " fuck unions" which unions are liberal , and I took a recent political test that I am moderate instead die-hard liberal. Secondly death is little extreme but how will continue your life without the public knowingly what you did.

Well you know if you attack autistic children you probably deserve to be bullied back. Privacy? Psh, she was bullying children who couldn't defend themselves or report the abuse. That is justification for the wire & any hardship that is put on her. She is a scummy bitch & to defend her with this "privacy" thing is completely counter-productive to cleaning up the corruption.

The public will always know which is something she will have to deal with but just because people know what she did wrong doesn't mean she can't or shouldn't keep on living. Unless the whole ordeal depresses her to a certain point.

Yeah but you know...the after effect of those thing can be pretty ugly do you remember Asian in the library video? The point is stuff happens..and it turns pretty ugly, like I do something wrong I try to erase my mark. The point begin I found her a bitch like the common sense of morality.

No it isn't. Do you understand how fucked up that sounds?

It really is not, at least if you value your own personal privacy. Hell, we could solve all kinds of crimes if we just became a police state. Why don't we just do that.

dude, the kids had no way of saying they were abused, the guy asked out right and she lied to his face, how else was this going to get out?

You are insane sir! The Golden Rule brother. Read it. If you commit a crime you deserve to be subjected to a similar punishment, with rare exceptions.


And yes it is. They are trying to stop this woman & we are running around whining about privacy! For Christ's sake if you want to complain about human rights being trampled on complain about the woman who subjected an Autistic Child to verbal beatings with the knowledge he could report it!

I've said this before and I'll say it again. That's not really a fair question. Neither of us could know whether or not they would be caught without the wire tap.

That's exactly my point. An eye for an eye, not a life for an eye. This social media stuff is cruel and unusual, or at the very least unusual.

Whining about privacy? Wow, that is a legitimately shocking thing to say. If you think privacy is such a petty and silly thing fine, you can live in a society that feels the same. But I value it highly and I refuse to lower its importance to the level you think it should be at.

Privacy is a good thing that we should strive to uphold, in a person's private time, such as not at work teaching your children. Seriously parents have every right to know what their teacher is doing while teaching their kids and the teachers shouldn't expect otherwise. If they're doing their job right then it's all good. You don't want someone teaching your kids who has reason to hide what they do in the classroom.

If they did it would have been later, like a lot later. Those kids would have only suffered more.

That's exactly my point. An eye for an eye, not a life for an eye. This social media stuff is cruel and unusual, or at the very least unusual.[/quote]
I never advocated a life for an eye. She isn't going to get the chair that is absurd. She is going to get bashed & be universally hated for a long while. The same environment she put those children in.


Whining about privacy? Wow, that is a legitimately shocking thing to say. If you think privacy is such a petty and silly thing fine, you can live in a society that feels the same. But I value it highly and I refuse to lower its importance to the level you think it should be at.[/quote]
No, you have making sound like I am saying "down with privacy!". You are taking privacy, weaponizing it into a petty off base argument, & flipping it around when you get called out to make it sound like I am against privacy.

And just so you know, working with other people's children isn't private time.

I disagree. It's my own personal feelings, but I don't think we should ever be watched. I value privacy over security.

Edit:

Who knows. I don't care to argue its efficiency.

I didn't mean to portray you as saying you were, I was just saying the same thing you were in a different way.

I don't really feel that way about you. So if it seems like I am trying to say that it is not intentional.

What are you talking about, how is it off base?

As I said above.

She was working in a public school. She was a teacher and working with other people's children. I would be shocked if the guy didn't tell people about it. Releasing her name was a bit drastic, but oh well. What you do in a government school, around students and other children, is I'm afraid not private.

Currently thousands of people around the world are being gunned down because they believe in basic human rights like the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion. Currently millions are starving and dying of thirst because there is no profit motive to save them. Currently billions are held in oppression by nations like China and Iran.

Why should we stop worrying about the problems of billions of human beings and instead focus on a relatively minor issue that one human being is having? That's nonsensical by any standard.

The sad thing is that Penn and Teller would probably agree with me.

That's so edgy of you, please have my first born children as sacrifices for your throne of edginess from which you will reign supreme over us mere mortals for the rest of time.

@GeneralofCarthage
I'll simplify this for you. I'm saying that you are a faggot.

Down with autism.