I thought someone said Gribbon was Napoleon & banned along time ago? Well I guess I was wrong. Hmm...
I'm online more than any other staff member, so I often catch shit as it's starting. I've temp banned users and multis before to prevent them from causing shit, which has been an accepted method. And I'd like to point out that TheFloatingGibbon, who Epiccheesegrater claims is real, has a habit of posting Kali's deleted message in his signature. Which is weird, because he just got here, never posts, and probably shouldn't even know who Kali is. Someone else has a habit of posting the same message in their signature too.
I wouldn't have to post it so often if somebody didn't keep deleting it. Anyway, I can't explain why he wanted to put it in his sig. Maybe he gained an admiration of Kali after their brief encounter.
Hey! I had fun with it, made a mystery game out of my username for you guys, which was fun... until you gave up on it. In no way was I a cause for its removal.
I really don't see why you must delete it in the first place. I doesn't violate any rules. Why did you choose that German attack jeep as your username?
That's irrelevant to the fact that since we removed it, we won't allow it to be reposted anywhere without consent.
Who needs our own wiki when you have Conservapedia. Look at this insightful and intelligent remark "Once the greatest nation in the world (from about 1815 to 1915), Great Britain has been nearly destroyed by atheism and socialism from within. Today she is a mere shadow of her former self." And there's an entire page devoted to 'atheism and bestiality'..!?!
Just because I agree with someone makes me a multi? Kali used to be Kalification when this site was the old site. He is very intelligent and feels strongly in his beliefs. Some of these beliefs are that Communism definitely causes more harm than good and you should help yourself before you help others. I posted Kali's message in my signature because I thought it should not have been deleted in the first place, also, posting deleted content equates to a 1 tier offense. Hardly justifying a full out ban. I do not have a 'habit' of posting said comment in my signature, I did it once. Kali is a well known member and has once been a mod, why should I not know who he is? Whether it was accepted or not, it was the wrong thing to do. The mods cannot ban someone on an assumption, and what do you mean 'cause shit?' What kind of shit can a multi cause anyway? Not saying that it should be allowed, just that you overreacted.
I completely agree. The Church of England is indeed a renowned atheist organisation, I wouldn't be surprised if they were secretly led by Richard Dawkins. Those socialists are also a present threat, with their agendas, such as 'public healthcare' and the BBC. That's preposterous. It violates no rules and should have the right to be sigged.
These aren't things a new member would be able to easily cite Again, irrelevant. We removed it. You don't repost it. That simple.
Why not? The threads go all the way back to the start. One tier offense. If mods cannot follow the rules, how did they get the position in the first place?
Your argument is flawed. You have given no justification for it's removal, you've just state the obvious over and over. It did not violate any rules, it should not be removed.
You joined long after Kali was a mod on the site, and for most of your time on here he hasn't been an active poster. That said, the mods didn't ban you, Chives did, which he shouldn't have. Stalin deleted it and if Stalin doesn't want something on his site then it's up to the staff to keep it that way. In terms of the actual rules, at this point it constitutes spam, and the original post violates the happiness and smiles act.
