Che is gone

Discussion in 'Archive' started by pedro3131, Aug 31, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Benerfe Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    El Presidente's Childhood Museum
    My concerns?!?! Think about the forum members. Not you, we.
  2. DukeofAwesome Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    114
    Location:
    New Jersey USA
    so what are your suggestions to solving your problem?
  3. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Most forum members are fine, and if they aren't, they give us valid suggestions. You stand alone on this one as far as I can tell, as I don't see anyone backing you up. If you do indeed have some supporters, feel free to pm me with suggestions, or make a thread here. Just complaining doesn't change things. What are "they" or you proposing anyway?
  4. 0bserver92 Grand King of Moderation

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,746
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Canada
    We thought about forum members we removed Che so people can go on here without being insulted and have have hate speech spewed at them.
  5. theteremaster Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    the deepest depths of the Australian netherworld
    che really raised the bar for worst forum member :lol:
  6. Benerfe Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    El Presidente's Childhood Museum
    Is this what all of you do, Single people out? There are many variables to an equation. Sure there is an answer to said equation. But if I start a thread to help bring back banned members such as Che, I will probably be spammed and ranted upon, and what will the mods do? Try to "distribute" justice all they do is leave one in the chamber and wait for the moment.
  7. Romulus211 Proconsul

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    10,153
    Likes Received:
    1,259
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Location:
    Los angeles, California, U.S.A.
    If your that passionate about it you wouldn't care what people thought of it.

    Che is a Perfect example.
  8. 0bserver92 Grand King of Moderation

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,746
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Canada
    If you started a thread to try to get him back I'll tell you right now it won't happen he's banned and will remain banned your thread would also be regarded as spam and be locked.
  9. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I didn't single you out. You said that you represented more than just yourself, and considering that no one else supported you, I asked you to point out said people who agreed with you. Very different from singling you out.

    Well, people would probably address the issue first, and explain why everyone was banned for a reason.

    That made no sense.

    Anyway, you still haven't presented any sort of argument for why we should bring Che back, especially with the overwhelming evidence against him. Nor have you proposed any way to fix what problems you have with the administration of the site. I would love to hear said arguments, but you seem to be dodging the question.
  10. theteremaster Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    the deepest depths of the Australian netherworld
    well he never will be able to get che back. Stalin has had enough so he isn't coming back.
  11. Benerfe Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    El Presidente's Childhood Museum
    How do you know Stalin has had enough? Cheflegel was unarmed this whole time, the mods are the ones with the "guns". My point is eradicated by the blood now splashed upon the rules of this site. I can only defend my argument by what im typing before you, and what I think. There is no need for arrogance or ignorance or GTFO's my statement is "invalid" to most of you. I shed one tear as I type this and maybe the Pokemon dream will come true...


  12. theteremaster Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    the deepest depths of the Australian netherworld
    Stalin was willing to keep che on. but he changed his mind when he saw che would not compromise.

    pick your heroes carefully
  13. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Che broke rules, so he got banned. Simple as that, and there was no figurative guns involved. And no, your point isn't eradicated, your just not making one. Plus, no one is being impolite.

    We all wait for you to make that point that you keep referencing.
  14. 0bserver92 Grand King of Moderation

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,746
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Canada
    No Stalin had enough because Che was wishing the death of people left and right and spouted hate speech just go into coffee house you will Che has said how can you possibly defend that?
  15. pedro3131 Running the Show While the Big Guy's Gone

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    No one's telling you to GTFO, or being disrespectful. We're just asking you why you think the way you do, and what you think should be done to make things better. Che launched hundreds of insults at users, wished death upon everyone on the site (including you) and personally singled out a few users and said he would delight in personally killing them. That isn't what this community was founded upon, and we as a community shouldn't have to stand for it.

    PS - I know you're just being colorful with language, but really, did we "splash blood on the rules of the site?"
  16. Benerfe Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    El Presidente's Childhood Museum
    Ill guess I will open up.

    Cheflegel broke the rules.

    But the element of Cheflegel will not be there anymore.

    Also I want Stalin to say "he has had enough" all I heard him say are quotes about Canada and US..

    And yes blood as been splashed on the rules of the site. A revolution is born.
  17. DukeofAwesome Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    114
    Location:
    New Jersey USA
    so really the only thing you're upset about is that you won't be able to read Che rant about stupid bullshit?

    EDIT: and you want closure from Stalin?
  18. pedro3131 Running the Show While the Big Guy's Gone

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Tempe, Az

    -JVS, dated Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:59 pm (Arizona time) In the thread about banning Che in the mod section of the forum. If you want verification I didn't make this up you can confirm with one of the tribunes (Ler or Raygun) as they have access to this part of the forum. Stalin won't be able to personally verify this for a few days as per his Vlog on the main page
  19. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well this is just ridiculous.
  20. Romulus211 Proconsul

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    10,153
    Likes Received:
    1,259
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Location:
    Los angeles, California, U.S.A.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Facebook: