Proposal

Discussion in 'Archive' started by NInja_Buffalo, Oct 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You and Kara are actually the only ones who are calling for all these changes. The vast majority don't agree with them. So why should we institute them? I'm constantly trying to change the site for the better, but I would only institute said changes if people wanted them. You just want to shove them down everyone's throat, which is selfish. When you have a majority backing, I would be willing to help institute changes, but for now, you represent a extreme and minuscule part of the sites user base.

    Also, your grammar is nearly unbearable. Is English your first language? I had to read that like six times to understand it.
  2. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    First, this idea obviously will not fly. We all have freedom of speech here (or at least a close approximation of it), including those whose opinions or ideas you don't like.

    Like who? You? Because even among those who propose ridiculous ideas, no one seems to agree with you that the moderators are corrupt.

    What does that even mean?

    This makes literally no sense.

    No shit, Sherlock.

    Again, another nonsensical question that should have been a statement.

    And now another nonsensical statement that should have been a question.
  3. theteremaster Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    the deepest depths of the Australian netherworld
    He is literally worse at the language than my girlfriend, and she needs specified classes to help her learn English.
  4. Benerfe Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    El Presidente's Childhood Museum
    We try to call for change but some of us get shot down, and called Che'lovers.

    We do represent a small part of the site and I thank you for the recognition.

    I try not to force it but it comes natural to me. Forgive me for my selfishness.

    And English is my first language, if that was a micro insult towards me, I deserve it, I'm sorry for bringing in history of peoples lives.
  5. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Representing a minority view is bound to garner insults. Deal with it. Che really was a dick though, so your almost certainly never going to get him back.

    Yeah, all two of you guys.

    It isn't difficult or complex to understand that most people don't support you, or want your ideas.

    Well, work on it. Grammar is a big part of being respected.

    Eh, it's no big deal. It was more funny than anything else.

    Point is, that you have no substantial argument. Come back with one, and more people might listen. And stop calling us corrupt, we aren't even close to that. It just looks silly, and no matter what Kara tells you, we are "deviating from a ideal". So just drop that as well. End of story.
  6. theteremaster Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    108
    Location:
    the deepest depths of the Australian netherworld
    Benerfe, i really don't like you.
  7. Benerfe Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    199
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    El Presidente's Childhood Museum
    I really don't understand the mentality of this.

    This is the Peoples assembly forum, not Assembly of insults.

    This started because people think that Karakoran is the only part of a "problem" whilst actually there are many people behind it.

    And we see that as a insult, and so we simply throw it back over the wall, then they use harsh language and hatred statement to suppress us.

    My grand statement probably belongs in a new topic, of which I do not want to kindle more fires to this sub-forum.

    But no offense Stalin but I think we are simply an outside dogs to him.

    He will post videos of his lets plays, and leave us to fight in the forum and not continue to set an example for us to follow.

    This is just a theory however.
  8. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Stalin already told you directly that Che isn't coming back, that it was his decision to ban him (though all of the mods agreed), and that you should drop the issue. If you're clinging to him for help then you've already sunk.
  9. sirdust Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    621
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Location:
    Switzerland
    I don't like this proposal.
    Just because you dissagree with a person doesn't give us the right to silence them.
    also i like reading the weekly nonesnese he posts in the pa, allways makes me smile.
  10. Demondaze Xenos Scum

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,456
    Likes Received:
    925
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    TEXASLOL
    Absolutely fucking not.

    I don't care what the issue is or on what side you stand, keep this bullshit out of my Assembly. No insults.
  11. C_G Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Wu Tang Province
    Benerfe kind of reminds of Fagpoleon. Wouldn't that be hilarious!
  12. Surfusa Lost in space-time

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Location:
    Parradise Valley, Arizona, United States of Americ
    I completely object...
  13. pedro3131 Running the Show While the Big Guy's Gone

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    No more insults, to include "fagpoleon".

    Obviously this proposal isn't going to happen, although I do appreciate the fact you guys worded it in the form of a bill/resolution.

    Che is not coming back.

    Please look up what corruption means, and then try to find some actual evidence of this before you keep accusing us of it.

    Also, just stop trying to use revolutionary language. You're not really saying anything, and clearly it's just getting people pissed off at you. Clearly you want to see some things changed. "Giving the site back to the people" isn't a real proposal. It doesn't actually say or propose anything, so even if someone agreed with the theory behind it, they wouldn't know where to begin.

    And again... No more personal insults, from either side.
  14. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    Even Surfusa acknowledges that Che Flegel shouldnt be allowed back. So just because 2 people think the moderators are corrupt, the majority has to agree with this and it mst be true. :roll:
  15. Karakoran Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,903
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    Hey Ninja,
    fuck you.

    Corruption:
    a : impairment of integrity, virtue, or moral principle : depravity

    And there's tons of shit I could go on and on about you impairing morals and justice and all that good stuff. Especially since it's mostly subjective.

    Also, I've seen Corruption defined as "the deviation from an ideal". In which case, if you don't accept the other response, this works too.
  16. LeonTrotsky Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Probably a little too harsh. Might just want to gently remind Kara that he might be a little bit overzealous at times, but to ban him altogether would be a grave mistake.
  17. Karakoran Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,903
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    Your right, Censorship is the one true answer.

    Why doesn't someone else propose a solution though?
    And don't throw me that bullshit about everything being sunshine and lollipops already because it's not.

    Maybe you do disagree, at least I'm trying.
  18. Karakoran Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,903
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    Ya, some good ol' Tyranny of the Majority.
    Censorship? I thought you liked free-thought.
    Off and on, but I like to think of myself as that.
    No I wasn't. I wanted to assist the cause but it was over before I could.
    How much more biased could you get? You openly stated that your side was 100% right and mine was 100% wrong. That's ridiculous.
    Imagine if Einstein just decided that the Theory of Relativity was preposterous and accepted the status quo. I wouldn't compare myself to him on a pesonal level, but I think saying that I should just give up is a terrible idea. Who knows, maybe I'll have an idea you'll like. Actually, I remember you liked one of them a while back.
    You obviously didn't get the point on 'My thoughts on forum democracy', and you probably didn't even bother to read the Situation Calming Committee suggestion. As well, you openly assume that everything I post is 100% what I want. No, it's not. I'm flexible and maybe someone's ideas will come around that I like.
    You are mortified that I don't accept whatever situation I happen to start with and don't blindly follow the authority?

    I'm mortified that you would say that simply because the majority believe something, they are completely right. The majority voted in Bush, twice I might add. Was that the best decision? Some would say no. Furthermore, I'm mortified that you would be so senselessly bashful of another frame of thought.

    You embrace other cultures, why not other ideologies?
    If it's a lost cause, why do you care? I've already lost, don't you know.
    Cool, so I guess the Revolutionaries should've just accepted that the 13 Colonies were a "lost cause" and been ruled by Monarchy?
    Ya, fuck other viewpoints.

    Hey, I'm not saying we should ban Chelsea, even if I disagree with her. People need opposites to keep themselves moderate. Not talking to others makes one extreme. Maybe if you had talked to others before posting this garbage you would've realized that it was garbage.
    lol

    I'm disgusted you would copy the World Assembly by the way. Come up with your own damn system.
  19. CoExIsTeNcE LeonTrotsky in Disguse

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    255
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I'll side with Kara on this one. No censorship. Don't double post.
  20. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    I disagree with all of Kara's ideas but to ban him from the PA is a terrible idea.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Facebook: