Ok, so I do not have the time nor the money to play mw3 and bf3, I would like those that have played both games to give me a heads up on which one is better (in their opinion), has more players, gamespeed (remember I rarely have much time and don't like quitting mid game) and has the better singleplayer. shoot away friends!
I don't have the desire to purchase either game, I'm going to buy Skyrim. >.> That being said, go to DSPgaming's channel on Youtube. He has played both the single player and multiplayer of BF3 and he just got MW3 so you will be able to check out vids of that too, soon. See for yourself which is more your style.
Oh god they made BF3 into MWBF3. People could spray 100m away and still get a kill and the Recon(sniper) has no offensive capabilities which basically means you have to camp like a bitch which is not what DICE intended when they designed the Recon class.
Well clearly if that is the case then you should get MWBF3 instead of just MW3 because then you're missing out on the BF while still getting the same MW. Unless MW3 is actually BFMW3, in which case you have to ask yourself, do I like my MW before my BF or my BF before my MW?
Cake. There both good game sin there own right, but I think MW3 is more fast paced, havent played it yet however, and battlefield is a, How do the brits say it? Smashing good time!!
The infantry feels like MW which i dislike. The accuracy rating of almost every player is very low because of that.
sweet, I see some good arguments here... I don't want to just check out one person on youtube as I kind of trust you guys more as a gaming community.
