He's just joined and you've decided to question him with Hitler. If that's not unwelcoming, I don't know what is. Not to mention that he's right. If anybody's the idiot here, it's you. Just stop posting and trying to play the part of the cool guy because he hated Cheflegel. Get your grammar correct before you call somebody an idiot.
Fuck im not useing a proxxy right now am i? NO MY INTERNET PORNS. but yeah sweet we in florida But hey you say your an expect on the two countries, do you know two languages (if i remember correctly are local Stalin knows Japanese) EVERYONE TOAST IS RIGHT, I AM GOING TO STOP POSTING RIGHT NOW.
I can't wait until he argues for them in a debate. I admit i don't know enough about Pol pot as a i should. I also wonder what his stance on the entire middle east deal is?
Unified? China has some of the most international dissent in the world. The Tibetans are constantly trying to rebel, there's democracy protests CONSTANTLY, and the workers all make 5 cents an hour while Chinese billionaires smoke cigars in their fancy chairs. Imagine the class struggle that would occur if China didn't repress practically everything. You might say things like the Occupy movement show how "disunified" America is. But really it shows how great America is that anyone anywhere can call for any change they wish. The Chinese wish they could do something like the Occupy movement, you know, without being attacked by the fucking army. I would assume he's very against Israel and wants a two-state policy, and a more secular Israel. I'd also assume he's very much against any influence from the West and is split on the issue of supporting the current Middle Eastern governments and the new Arab Spring. I would probably say his solution to the issue would be for the UN to leave it and let the Arab Congress sort it out, although favor some of the less oppressive governments to stay in power, ie. Jordan.
Actually the Occupy movement is showing that America is "disunified". 90 percent of the people there don't know what the hell they are talking about and the other people can't agree on why they are there. Since when was all the police brutality at the Occupy protests proof that Americans can do anything without a government official intruding? Looks the same as the Vietnam protests that had the military in place of the donut squads.
It's designed that way. 1) You get people from all walks of life. The Environmentalists protest along side the Communists because they hardly know better. 2) It's harder to take down because if you remove legitimacy one section, say the wealth inequality, you have a million other things to protest about. 3) It's harder for someone to personally profit from the movement. Obviously it can still happen, but no one will be a millionaire because they headed the Occupy movement. The Occupy movement has been going on 2 months and there's been only a few acts of obvious brutality. Other times they seem like over zealous or nervous police making honest accidents. If it was actually an attack on the Occupy movement we wouldn't be pepper spraying two people every time the Police did something. We'd be breaking backs like it was the 50s. Besides, a lot of the hostile reactions from the police are due to events the protesters did, like when they ransacked a Whole Foods. Ok, when the National Guard is marching down Manhattan you can say we're like Vietnam. But we're sending riot patrols, not the military.
I was waiting for you to come in. I was right, you are going for the confrontation before Kali. Why can't you just ignore people if they say something about the US you don't like?
I like it because it starts arguments and i like to see both sides, next i'll be meeting with OP today so this should be interesting.
Um... you DO realize that those Tibetans are in the minority, right? The majority of Tibetans are not campaigning for independence, or even greater autonomy. Proof please. Last I checked, the bottom wages were higher than that. In fact, workers are now starting to be selective about their jobs because there is now more work than people to do it and manufacturers are now complaining about lacking workers. More work than people = higher wages and better leverage to demand benefits. http://www.bsr.org/reports/Labor_Shortage_and_Employment_Practices_in_China_Final.pdf Not ENTIRELY sure about the reliability of this, but I saw alot of other articles and reports like it when I searched 'Chinese factories labor shortage'. Sounds like alot of prosperous Capitalism-based countries. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/25/china-landgrab-inquiry-wukan-protests Search 'Chinese land protests'.
This will be hypocritical, but... I concur with Kali. If a discussion is warrented on the topics addressed here, a thread should be started in one of the thread sections, not in the introduction section.
