New Mod of 2011

Discussion in 'Archive' started by Lighthouse, Dec 24, 2011.

?

Who should be new mod

Poll closed Jan 1, 2012.
Link 2 vote(s) 8.7%
Link 1 vote(s) 4.3%
Link 1 vote(s) 4.3%
Toast 3 vote(s) 13.0%
Che! 3 vote(s) 13.0%
Viking 4 vote(s) 17.4%
Romulas 2 vote(s) 8.7%
Comrade Ler 3 vote(s) 13.0%
Stormfront USSR ( He is coming back Damnit! ) 4 vote(s) 17.4%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. UnholyKnight800 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,003
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    That house
    This thread now serves a new purpose. And this new purpose doesn't look good. :confused:
  2. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We don't lock threads because of where they "might" be going. So no.
  3. ComradeLer Proud Anti-Patriot

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,239
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Stralya
    I'm not arguing otherwise. You are a cool guy.
    That being said, Stalin has made it clear that there will be no new mods at this time.
    Plus the thread is quickly devolving into a shit-throwing fest.

    @ Matt - Your call.
  4. UnholyKnight800 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,003
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    That house
    Until it reaches the shit-throwing fest, no reason to lock yet.
  5. Jack118 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    843
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Texas
    Derp, of all the people on here I think that Ler is the most composed and Is on here for enough time to be a mod, and I think this thread would move along if you ignore anything toast says that you find offensive.
  6. UnholyKnight800 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,003
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    That house
    Toast is a social commentator, nothing else.
    TheKoreanPoet and Toast like this.
  7. 0bserver92 Grand King of Moderation

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,746
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Canada
    It was a spam fest from the very beginning it should be locked.
  8. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    You're only responding to my post because I called you out on being a whiny tit. lol

    I'm not saying that Chelsea is a "terrible human being" (though that is what I think), I'm saying that she is terrible at being a mod. Those are two different things. Again, people are wanting to lock a thread that is actually getting to a point about things. Piss off, mate.
  9. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not spam, it's relevant to the OP. And the OP violates no rules, so we have no reason to lock the thread.
  10. 0bserver92 Grand King of Moderation

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,746
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Canada
    No this entire thread is spam it's just posting about link and like I said before the PA should be reserved for serious topics.
  11. Romulus211 Proconsul

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    10,153
    Likes Received:
    1,259
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Location:
    Los angeles, California, U.S.A.
    Who is to decide what is serious or not? you? HA. This could be a serious discussion to someone else, but because it is unorthodox it is automatically deemed unserious.
  12. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Spam would imply that the posts aren't relevant to the OP, which they are. Seeing as the OP isn't spam, and is a legitimate poll, no matter how silly you think it is. So, you clearly can't determine if it's a serious topic, as that isn't our place to decide. If the discussion gets out of hand, we will lock it, but we won't lock it just because you don't like Link.
  13. ComradeLer Proud Anti-Patriot

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,239
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Stralya
    Haven't read the thread past the first few posts, and this/part of the last page. In my opinion, Chelsea is one of the more held-together mods on the team. In fact, the only people who have complained about her and you, egyptianplanet, and che. Considering the amount of insults you've thrown, or even the graphic rape/sex jokes made about her, I'd say it would be pretty normal for somebody to be upset.

    And again, the worst thing she had really said is 'I have no respect for you', which I believe was aimed at SovietEmpireUSSR. I speak to the guy regularly, and he holds no ill feeling toward her for that.
  14. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    What graphic rape jokes? I have never once made a graphic rape joke about Chelsea. I probably have made a graphic rape joke, but certainly not about her. I do believe that I called her a terrible moderator in a thread about Lucy, which is probably the reason why she dislikes me. I also enjoy antagonizing her a lot.

    She has claimed that she hated me so much that she wanted to kill herself. I guess that's just not as bad as the shit she flung at Soviet, but you've probably payed more attention to Soviet because you enjoy sucking his cock and so possess an overwhelming bias when it comes to these things.

    Again, Link would be a much better moderator than Chelsea. He certainly excels where she does not, and matt is right in saying that Link would be a good mod.
  15. ComradeLer Proud Anti-Patriot

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,239
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Stralya
    Look, I really don't care that much to write some big response to you. The only reason I responded in the first place is because Chelsea and me are friends. Seeing as nobody seems to be taking this seriously, I don't see the point in responding. So uh.. Yeah.
  16. UnholyKnight800 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,003
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    That house
    So Ler how are you these days? Still annoyed at my attitude during games?
  17. ComradeLer Proud Anti-Patriot

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,239
    Likes Received:
    373
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Stralya
    I think you're a cool guy, and that I over-reacted 'A bit'. I'm down for another session though, when everybody gets online.
  18. Chelsea366 Retired Moderator

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,865
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Gensokyo
    I have claimed that if everyone on the planet was the way you are on here then yes. Besides you aren't one to talk about being insulted (unless it actually breaks the rules) as you are one of the most insulting members here.
    Like that for example.
  19. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    As you can see, even Chelsea's best friends cannot even provide a reason as to why Chelsea shouldn't be replaced by Link. Solid proof as to why this is a completely viable idea. Now, sit by and watch this thread get locked.
  20. matthewchris Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Slightly off topic, but Ler, your signature is retarded.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Facebook: