Iowa Cacuses

I'm voting for My hairy ass again.

He changes his stance on all the issues every damn minute. He does not even know what he wants.

Paul wins Iowa, Obama wins final.

I would rather have Mitt who flip flops on everything than the stupidity of the others.

You'd rather have the person who can not make up his own mind over Obama or Huntsman?

Well out of the Republican candidates.

Though im interested if Paul's viewpoints if he becomes the runner for the GOP result in a fundamental shift in the republican viewpoint.

If he becomes the nominee I'd imagine someone would run as an independent more in line with the GOP's normal views. Most would get behind Paul, simply because he's better than Obama, but at least one Conservative ideologue would run against him and give Obama a free second term.

Well from the recent polls it looks like Romney, Paul, Santorum, or Perry will win. I think Paul or Romney will win, but Santorum and Perry's poll numbers show they could win.

Santorum would be winning handily if Perry or Bachmann dropped out. I love it when vote splitting does good things (2011 Canadian election what what).

As much as I like Perry, Huntsman should have surged instead of Santorum. I want to see how he does as the frontrunner for awhile. I am proud of Perry for at least making sure Santorum stays in third.

I don't know how anyone can like Rick Perry but sure. Huntsman is a cool cat. His problem is he doesn't have enough money to convince people he's not just another version of Mitt Romney, and is in fact, a vastly superior version of Mitt Romney. If Santorum can surge in Iowa, I guess its feasible that Huntsman can surge in New Hampshire. If not theres always 2016. Or 2020.

I like him for his economic and foreign policy, not his religious beliefs or his beliefs on gays. Also, as his "friend" I kind of feel obligated to. I like Huntsman. I consider him my second choice, because Paul has gone crazy.

My main guess is that Obama will win in the end, because as of right now the Republican field is pretty weak if even that.

I really don't see anything very distinguishable between all of their economic policies. Most of them want to do the same thing. Lower taxes, lower spending. Those are good things but Perry is disqualified in my book for being insane. I think what differentiates Huntsman is the approach he takes to policy. He has a very rational, very intelligent, very cost-benefit approach to his economic and foriegn policy. He thinks diplomacy should always be the first option, but isn't afraid to use force to defend the nation's interests.

I can see how people would think that, because of the ad and all, but believe it or not Anita Perry has reveled the they do not hate homosexuals and they have a lot of gay friends. Like I said Huntsman is cool, but I will stand with Gov. Perry first. He stands in line with what I believe in. Romney is too Liberial, and Paul is horrible at foreign policy. Santorum is bad for the sole fact he can't laugh at himself, something I value and something Gov. Perry does well. Gingrich is just the worst out of all of them. Anyone who cheats on their cancer stricken wife, and gives her the divorce papers in the hospitle room shouldn't run our country. Also Bachmann is too Right-Wing for me.

What about our election?

Since when did the dictatorship of Stephen Harper allow elections?