And austrilla was a place where England sent all of the criminals so you are a convict and or a terrorist so take THAT sire.
90% of my posts are serious. I never said anything about homosexual ever. Nor do I hate Native Americans. No wonder you have a hatred of me, you think I stand for all these ridiculous points. I've never done that. I'm merely saying Toast is the agitator on this forum.
Didn't Stalin himself call you a racist? In any case, while I may not have many fans, I don't see myself as an "agitator". If anybody is the agitator here, it's you.
And then took it back. The first step is admitting it. Ever notice how the thread turns into a flame war after you post?
I'm sure the only reason he took it back is because you ended up crying about "injustice" and "bribery". I'd like you to give me one example in which I have turned a thread into a flame war.
Toast has never turned a thread into a flame war. Kara, on the other hand, has turned threads into flame wars after he starts bitching about Toast.
The following is just my opinion. From what I can tell, Toast often bends the topic away from its original course. I use "bends" because it is often slightly related, but not really. Those posts are often provocative, and thus other short-tempered forum goers get angry and the thread divulges into a heated argument, but not really a flame war in the majority of cases. Kara is a little different. A lot of his posts go along the lines of: "I think your opinion is shit. Here's why." but less strong and more subtle. He contributes to the discussion, but can be quite rude. Maybe that's too strong a word, but he is quick to criticize, and a little heavy handed at it. This also elicits replies from the snappier and more vocal members of the forums. Just my two cents, you don't have to agree.
The thing about Toast is that I find it hard to disagree with him on...well, a lot of things. And not because he's provocative about it or whatever you want to call it, he's generally just right. The fact that he makes it hilarious to read makes him generally awesome.
My stance is that a lot of what he says is wrapped in truth or has some elements of truth, but he's gone too far.
Too far? Pssh, this is the internet, you can hardly go too far. Not to mention it generally tends to go both ways.
1. Pardon me is I am wroung but you have attacked native americans and used other racist terms. 2. ... fail bro.
I remember something like this as well, can't remember exactly when, though. It was some time before your 180 turn in your viewpoint on pretty much everything.
I meant a 360 turn, which, thanks to Unholy, I now realise is the wrong number. Lemme fix that. I'm a fucking idiot.
