So I am just gunna come out and say it.

No, the term libertarian was first used by the Enlightenment thinkers who believed in free will. The first persons to use the term or William Belsham and William Godwin, being the first a classical liberal and the second was an anarchist (but a believer in free market).

And they were real marxist states. their beloved prophet, Karl Marx, created the idea of party vanguardism

No, he didn't. That was Lenin. Stop this 'I've read the communist manifesto' crap - it's obvious you haven't. Also, Communists believe in physically abolishing state, which makes you much more of a statist than us.

Willian Godwin believed in a market, but not a capitalist market.

If they where "Marxist States" Then the power would be held directly by the proletariat class.

Eh. More of a usury-free barter market, not all that much different than markets as they we're in most Feudal societies where the Church had decreed things like interest "sinful".

How can an anarchist be both anti-authority and anti-hierarchy and yet pro-capitalism? Corporations are one of the best examples of autocratic, authoritarian, hierarchical structures we have.

A gender equality post has become in a, umm, our usual discussion. That's so weird!

To be fair, he said "free market" not "capitalist market". Which would still be wrong on his part since usury (rent, interest, ect) is seen by Anarchists as a violation of various collective and individual rights.

Do you guys learn all this things at school, on Wikipedia, or reading each respective book (for example, Wealth of Nations)? In the case of the third one being the answer, where do you get the time or the will?

I just put together various pieces of the puzzle I've picked up over the years, post my findings, wait for someone to present a counter that I can't conceivably refute, and then revise and edit to reflect what I've learned.

Mostly 3 but some 2 and some other.

Mmm, I see. Although, ignore my comment, it's totally off topic; I may create a post about it later. I made an etnography about the forum back in highschool, feel honored (?

Women could rule until they had to go shopping for more shoes.

If there wasn't gossip though they'd hardily speak.

No actually you are wrong.

I'm aware of that (btw, are you doing a PhD?), my question was mainly for our "under 18" members.

Many people debunked the ideals of Marx (mainly the Austrian School).

And yes he spoke of what a "communist" state would be like (you should have said marxian socialist state). It would be a period between capitalism and communism, where the "workers" state ( also known as "dictactorship of the proletariat") would own all property.

Sorry, but that argument fails. The marxist-leninist socialist states (and all his variants) did what Marx and Engels wrote about the transitional period between capitalism and communism. After the Paris Commune, Marx started believing more that communists had to form a party to reach political power.

As a normal human (like you or anyone else in this world), I talk from my mouth.

I believe that a normal and at the same time, great argument to reject the ideals of Marx in order to reach it´s achievements, it stomps the greatest human right: FREEDOM.

Everybody is always debunking the arguments of other, because always everybody is saying the "truth". In this kind of things, everything is subjective. I would quote Hugo, but I don't feel like searching the book.

Nope.

You talk thanks to your vocal folds, diafragm, lungs and air. You mouth just articulates.