Who would you vote for?

Discussion in 'The Political/Current Events Coffee House' started by Keiser, Mar 17, 2012.

?

Who would you vote for in 2012 for president?

Mitt Romney 1 vote(s) 1.4%
Rick Santorum 2 vote(s) 2.7%
Newt Gingrich 2 vote(s) 2.7%
Ron Paul 17 vote(s) 23.3%
Barack Obama 39 vote(s) 53.4%
Other 12 vote(s) 16.4%
  1. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    Lol what?
  2. FascistPatriot voted for Obama

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Message Count:
    307
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Imprisoned in a vile barbaric caliphate.
    He brought the dead child home so he could teach his other kids the value of life. He realized that just because it's a fetus it's still a life.
  3. RickPerryLover strawberries oh sweet Jesus strawberries

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Well please address those other concerns then.
  4. FascistPatriot voted for Obama

    Member Since:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Message Count:
    307
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Imprisoned in a vile barbaric caliphate.
    I support no child left behind, The other two criticisms are valid but I still say he's better than the others in the race.
  5. RickPerryLover strawberries oh sweet Jesus strawberries

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    118
    But.... it keeps the kids who should be ahead behind!!!
    slydessertfox and Imperial1917 like this.
  6. Keiser Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    25
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    12
    Location:
    Long Island, NY, USA
    It amazes me how stupid Americans can be... Let me guess you watch Fox News too? Well for your own good get your news from more then one place and make sure it isn't one-sided lies and bullcrap.

    Our "police of the world" policy is just an excuse for our wars. People are stupid enough to think we are helping people. The only people we are helping are ourselves, we would be safer if we didn't piss these people off so much they're willing to blow themselves up. Stop blaming them and blame ourselves. (Especially 9-11 if it wasn't the government)

    Also on Iran, we are blowing the horns of war and regrouping our forces to continue expanding our middle eastern empire. When your mourning the death of a loved one I hope you can think and see that we are causing all harm and nothing good except to the people making money off the War. Neo-imperialistic garbage policy. :mad:
  7. LeonTrotsky Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    That's a little strong, however I will agree with FascistPatriot (probably for the only time ever). Ron Paul has no chance of winning, lets face the facts. His foreign policy is great... if we were Switzerland. The United States is a world superpower. It would be foolish to think that we could ever adopt an isolationist policy.
    slydessertfox likes this.
  8. RickPerryLover strawberries oh sweet Jesus strawberries

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Yep Paul has no chance at all. He wants to get rid of the Fed!!! This man is a bit of his rocker...
  9. crocve Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Message Count:
    682
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    78
    It´s amazing how this people are always speaking badly about american imperialism , but now when a candidate that wants to end that imperialism appears, they accuse of him of isolationism and of having bad policies. The guy wants to end the sanctions and open relations with Cuba, for Darwin´s sake! That is a good thing.
    ComradeQueso likes this.
  10. RickPerryLover strawberries oh sweet Jesus strawberries

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Its sure not all about foreign policy. He wants to get rid of the fed. He is unfit to lead this nation.
  11. PopePnwer Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Message Count:
    561
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The only place that's real, my mind
    Actually i think people like that stuff, it's his main drive. What people give him shit for his stupid economic policies. "Lets get back on the gold standard and abolish income tax!" Yeah that's gonna work.
    slydessertfox likes this.
  12. crocve Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Message Count:
    682
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    78
    An economy with no taxes, can have much more prosperity, since the people have one less obstacle to reach higher in their life.
  13. RickPerryLover strawberries oh sweet Jesus strawberries

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    118
    Michelle Bachmann wanted no taxes.... just throwing that our there.
    slydessertfox likes this.
  14. PopePnwer Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Message Count:
    561
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    The only place that's real, my mind
    Yeah but then there's no stuff for people to use. No infrastructure. Which means we all go back to the dark ages. Either that or corporations do everything and we get screwed over on everything because they would have us by the balls. That would negate the point of no taxes.
  15. shlacka Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Message Count:
    221
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    13
    Location:
    USA
    I wouldn't vote even if I wasn't only 17. Voting for a candidate is not the some as voting for a policy. It's a bullshit circus show, and there are plenty of far more effective ways to influence politics.
  16. Shisno Doesn't know who did this

    Member Since:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,641
    Likes Received:
    739
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    NKVD Underground
    No, the Republican Primary is the bad circus show.
  17. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Ronny for self interest of getting out men out of Afghanistan. If US pulls out we will too. I don't know what demon possessed us to get involved. But in reality all your candidates are batshit crazy corrupt scum. These people belong in mental hospital, not in politics.
  18. Karakoran Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,903
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    Ron Paul! Hilarity will ensue.
    slydessertfox and ComradeLer like this.
  19. crocve Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Message Count:
    682
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    78
    If a small state still exists, there will be no going back to the dark ages.
    The Shaw likes this.
  20. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    We can support infrastructure while at the same time abolishing personal taxes on the citizenry. Especially at the federal level. The Federal Government could probably survive off of small tariffs if it were to follow the principles of Jefferson.

Share This Page

Facebook: