But that would cost money! James Cameron would never spend money if it didn't get anything in return. (Even if that would be awesome.)
Well look at the money its going to make.Do you know how many women want to watch this film?Iv always hated the movie and yet Ill be forced to sit through and criticize things like the fact theres was room or two on the debris at the end.
Yeah but I was talking about completely redoing the ending of the movie which would be very expensive and probably wouldn't help enough to warrant the cost. It would also ruin the movie and make a bad movie stupid as hell. On top of that people don't like change that big so less people would see it. But just putting it in 3-D? Yeah that's pretty smart. And yeah the original ending always has me yelling at the T.V. (which is embarrassing).
Still a good old Love film is good to watch every now and then and helps you look "romantic" which to me is sharing a 50 bag but obviously means something different to most women
Hollywood is running out of ideas so now they take 1 of 3 options for making films. A remake, a shitfest in the spirit of disaster movie or similar titles and releasing shit in 3D.
Saw it tonight the 3d is fairly shit and waste of 12 euro I got kicked out of the cinema so my gf was fairly pissed off with me.
How did you manage to get booted out of the cinema? I've only ever gotten warned because I yawned too loud.
I do a little commentary on the movie I mean I pay for it.I get kicked out of most films especially since the staff are pricks.
This was actually a huge feat. I am so amazed with the work that went into this. I am happy that on this 100th anniversary the Titanic will continue to captivate the world.
It wasn't exactly a huge feat. Only people who aren't old enough to remember when Titantic came out will like the 3D remake. Plus it never really captivated anyone in the first place. Men and Black and Tomorrow Never Dies came out in the same year and they were far, far better.
