Half Asian, the white half drags me down in it. Math was certainly not my best subject but I can still get by with it, I just refuse to do it out of principle as math is fucking evil. Rules are back to normal now.
Second only to Stalin and Stalin gets about 500 likes every video that he posts so no-ones going to pass him. Everyone likes his content, otherwise we wouldn't be here.
I was hoping for a response where I could make a, "It's not the size, it's how you use it joke." but was stopped by you making a well worded, factual response.
I think this is flawed, some users post more, and to help other users more often than make witty comments. What defines efficient users?
But wouldn't some of the trophy point mess it up? For instance, I think my efficiency score is a lot higher because I registered early on.
Not very definitive... Anyway, whatever, by your rules. I'm not gonna do the math, you can if you want to, but I don't like math, so no.
Well to be fair chealsea was here from pretty much the beginning and she has a shitton of likes. This is what i hate about the like feature though is people start becoming self conscious if they don't have a good like to post ratio... frankly i don't give a shit what my like post ratio is and neither should anyone else.
It's just a forum game, it doesn't have to have a perfect system. Also good man, reject Satan's vile creation.
True, although on average, the ratios should be scaled similarly, with Stalin being the obvious exception as likes on videos count towards likes on the forum. Of course, this ratio has no effect on anything whatsoever, nor should it affect anyone's opinion on anyone. As for the rest, well, you explained that perfectly.
Well, I would say user efficiency is determined by frequent, useful posts, not just at least one like to every post. But, you know, just trying to add in two cents. Wait what, forum game? Oh, I thought this was to determine who is the most efficient user. As in, so that they may boast about it and stomp over everybody else like a douche.
