Moments in Human History that changed the World?

Discussion in 'Historical Events Coffee House' started by VladimirGLenin, May 3, 2012.

  1. C_G Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Wu Tang Province
    German tribes weren't the cause; merely the catalyst.
  2. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    What?
  3. yuri2045 A Marines Biologist

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,767
    Likes Received:
    328
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    Curitiba, Brasil
    Wtf???? lol
  4. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    Indeed likewise Roman society did not fall with the Empire itself. So setting a date or a cause for the fall of rome is meaningless.
  5. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    There were many causes, but at the forefront of them was the inability to properly defend their borders from invaders, mainly from said place the Romans failed to passify after the Teutoburg forest battle.
  6. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    Pacify.
    And, unlike most people on the internet, I will not pretend to be an expert on Roman history, however neither will abandon my statements.
  7. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    Damnit, I always get that word wrong.
  8. GeneralofCarthage Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Ankara
    I think you meant "spanned" but I wasn't sure.
    yuri2045 likes this.
  9. Bart (Moderator) NKVD Channel Maintainer

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    294
    Location:
    Nootdorp, The Netherlands
    I'll say it again. This is all assuming that it changed anything. How do you know they would have expanded more? How's that a certainty?
  10. C_G Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Wu Tang Province
    How can you say that Teutoborg forest would have pacified the german tribes? What evidence can you possibly have to suggest this?
  11. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    The Romans had all but pacified Germany by this time. Again, I refer you to look at Caesar in Gaul. This uprising, was similar to Vercingetorix's uprising. It was their last chance, and they were gonna gamble everything. If they had lost, then they would have given up, like the Gauls did, and ended up, again, like the Gauls did.
    Jesus fucking christ, the Romans had by this time already expanded to the Elbe. They withdrew from that area after Teutoburg, because Augustus feared the Germans were gonna come pouring through Gaul.
    Spartacus likes this.
  12. Bart (Moderator) NKVD Channel Maintainer

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    578
    Trophy Points:
    294
    Location:
    Nootdorp, The Netherlands
    Really, apart from the fact if you're wrong or right, there's another thread.
    slydessertfox likes this.
  13. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    Meh.
  14. greatmustachio Mount & Blade Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Message Count:
    752
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Germany
    There are many reasons for Roman expansion in this times. The first that comes to mind is not unlike the reason the Greeks had to found a shitload of colonies all over the northern Meditereanian Sea and the Black Sea Region: Lack of suitable farm land in the home land (I could go deeper into this, like explaning the inheritance laws leading to this problems and the reforms that promised every soldiere land after his duty was done etc etc, but I don't think it's neccessary). One other reason was the mass amount of wealth Rome gathered through conquest. And the third reason, and one of most overlooked, is the ambition some few man had, to become this great conqueror. Julius did it, and many more too. Fact is, the Battle at Teuteburg Forest happened 100 years before the Roman Empire reached it's maximal extent. So based on these facts, we can assume that expanding further into the Germanic realm is exactly what was planned.
    On the otherhand I seriously doubt that this battle was the one factor that lead to the decision not to do it. There were more, and mor important ones.
    Bart likes this.
  15. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    Wasn't the reason they withdrew in the first place because they lost 3 of their best legions, and feared that the Germans would launch an invasion of Gaul?
  16. greatmustachio Mount & Blade Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Message Count:
    752
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Germany
    There wasn't "the Germans", there were many many tribes that hated other tribes and had bloodfeuds and this and that. If they were to be united, maybe, but they weren't. So no.
  17. The Shaw Rawnald Gregory Erickson the Second

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,426
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    243
    Location:
    New York
    I would trust this guy, he's german.

    Also sly I find it hilarious how you always spout your 'knowledge' of Roman history when you fail to acknowledge that the Germans were very disunited.
  18. Spartacus Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    973
    Likes Received:
    391
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    When he says Germans, he is refering to the various tribes that would frequently trouble the Empire throughout it's history(especially in the latter years). Had Teutoburg not happened, most of the tribes and confederations(Franks, Saxons, Alemanni ) that would trouble the Romans so much later on, would be pacified and Romanized.
    slydessertfox likes this.
  19. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    I know the Germans were not united. There were so many freaking Germanic tribes that I don't know the name of, that I just refer to them as Germans or Germanic tribes. I read somewhere though, that the Romans were afraid that the Germanic tribes that Ariminius had united for a long time would invade Gaul. That's what I meant.
    Jesus fucking christ, I know they were not one united group. I just refer to them as Germans or Germanic tribes, because there are so many that I don't know the names of at the time, and Ariminius united quite a few.
    Spartacus likes this.
  20. greatmustachio Mount & Blade Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Message Count:
    752
    Likes Received:
    205
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Germany
    That would not have changed anything. Remember why the Germanic tribes troubled the Romans later on. They had to move west, because they fled from those coming from the east. Now, in your scenario, other tribes like the Samartians as an example would have fled from the huns into Roman lands, result is the same (more or less). The Roman Empire of the later days was bound to fall. Now, you can argue that the fleeing germanic tribes accelerated that process, but not to the degree you and sly want to make it to.

Share This Page

Facebook: