Who qualifies as the most despicable world leader in recent history?

Honestly I find this to be very childish of him.

You mean i guessed it were is my Present?

I love sarcasm.

I hope you all realize just how asinine this post is.

Based on what?

So who outnumbers who now, the communist or the capitalist of the forums? Who actually matter and give a shit about it.

WERE SO RANDUM XD
Don't tell someone they're "new". This website is not good. You do not get to be proud of being here for a long time.

The overwhelming majority of the "extremists" here are underage communists. The people you say are radical right wingers are actually centrist average joes, and the definition of a moderate.

Lenin was a big douche, and killed plenty of people, but he never really got the chance to be as big a douche as the other options, so maybe you could reasonably defend him, you know, if you're some kind of dirty commie, but Stalin and Mao are just not morally defensible at all. If you think defending them is anything but despicable, you are delusional.

Stalin and Mao killed millions and Im proud of that.

Which means that intelligent people can still be incredibly ignorant, though that is usually not the case. When someone can't properly form a sentence in their native language, intelligence is not the first thing that comes to mind.

Implying you don't live in the United States.

Hurr hurr strawman.

As proven by science last Thursday and widely believed by people who can't handle English, even though they are native speakers.

And some of them make mistakes constantly, to the point where their posts are incomprehensible garbage. Can you figure out who I'm referring to?

I cannot speak to whether it is his native language, but I still put forth that knowledge does not necessarily constitute a vast amount of intelligence.
Recall that IQ tests are under critisizm for the reason that they test knowledge, not intelligence.

Barbs at my location aside, if you look REALLY CLOSELY, you will see that the statement was not referring to me.

Hardly.
Reread the posts.

If volume alone can prove the assertion, I would point out that the English language is among the most word-rich and quite possibly the fastest growing.

Not myself, certainly.
Definately not yourself.
However, I can think of a handful not already ruled out.

However, I would hardly call the mere statements made so far in this thread 'incomprehensible'.
Rather, I would assert that some people are too impatient to try and understand them.
That is hardly a mark of a lack of intelligence. They were simply attuned to a different audiance.

Sigh. Is it that time of the month again?

Sigh, yeah it is.

The Pope obviously, But out of the three I have to say Mao.

An intelligent person who is not also knowledgeable is virtually indistinguishable from your average NASCAR fan. How am I supposed to value your opinion and come to the conclusion that you are, in fact, an intelligent person if you can't even properly express yourself.
I was reluctant to reply to you in the first place because now I have to force myself to understand what you are saying.

The implication was obvious, and if that wasn't your intention then it just further proves my point.

It was a shameless straw man. Nobody said that people who don't know English are stupid.

That doesn't matter, fluency does not require knowledge of the entire vocabulary of a language.

Stupid topic is stupid.

Yeah just look at all those other threads, that's where all the quality content is.

This forums has been lacking in quality content as of late.

Thank you, oh generous forums watchdog, for translating my sarcastic remark. God forbid it flies over someone's head. You should consider that more often as it would be greatly appreciated.

I'm glad to be of assistance, I mean someone has to translate your genius words or else we would be lost in confusion.

At least the other topics try to maintain the illusion.

27M is the number i learned in school, but i imagine it's much lower.