If they're going to behave like savages and cavemen then that's what I'll call them. If the universe would somehow change my entire being, then I wouldn't be myself so I don't really care for that imaginary scenario.
^I don't think the point there trying to make is working on you, don't know if your trying to ignore it or just incapable to understand that your an asshole with your superiority complex.
If "working" means I'm supposed to break down, maybe confess my sins or something and beg forgiveness then you are right it certainly is not working. I don't really give a shit if people think I'm wrong, or if you think I think I'm better then others. I'm entitled to just as many opinions as they are as the religious like to babble, so really unless you people actually give me a REASON not to think they aren't savages I feel no need to concede anything to you. Ignorant savages have made shit up to fill in the gaps in their knowledge all through human history. It's blatantly obvious that religion is an archaic cultural development, not divinely inspired. The same imaginary answers are still used today, to my despair. Why is any of the above incorrect? I will not address anything from this point out that is not an argument.
I'm not trying to argue against you. In all honesty I think you're a pretty smart guy and more people would feel the same if you weren't constantly filling your posts with deconstructive shock garbage that contributes absolutely nothing to the overall message you're trying to get across. Then again, being a modern atheist is all about the shock factor and being "edgy".
This entire form of reasoning places you within the same sphere of those you claim to hate; the savages, imbeciles, and amoral beasts who plague the human race with the bile that they spew forth from the orifice that they use to communicate. If you are so blinded that you cannot see any good that has come from any religion, then any response to your posts will fall on deaf ears, or, rather, plugged ones. You seem to be similar to Kevin from Valis, so wrapped up in his own cynicism and discomfort of the state of the reality that they live in, irrelevant of the existence or non-existence of a deity, that everyone must partake of his view. To quote Stephan Crane, "Think as I think,” said a man, “Or you are abominably wicked; You are a toad.”And after I had thought of it, I said, “I will, then, be a toad.”
I honestly don't know where you ever got you should break down and confess your sins as no one has said it in the thread so far, there is many places I could take this but to be honest I don't have a psychology major to make any analyzes of your behavior. Even though you are 100% right in the regard your allowed to say your babble, which is just babble. Honestly the fact that you want to to list every single religious person as savages is insulting, more so that you believe your own ideology to be right and you to be enlightened. Even if you have a rational argument over theist you are going about it with a attitude of a ten year old child, thus no matter what you say I can never take you seriously because I never want to be assossiated with an asshole like yourself. by calling someone a savage and holding yourself to a high regard you have proven to me that you share the same qualities of a savage. If you honestly want to debate someone religious views go ahead, but when you act like an asshole don't be surprised when people point it out. But honestly you give a great example to "Atheist everywhere". Now do an argument without trying to be "edgy"
I think you're imagining someone else, I'm pretty big on social liberty. If you'd all stop crying and actually argue we might even get a conversation going here. Now do I need to copy paste my argument or will you all just ignore it? I'll copy paste it as you are all jumping on the band wagon and probably are incapable of scrolling up at this point: Ignorant savages have made shit up to fill in the gaps in their knowledge all through human history. It's blatantly obvious that religion is an archaic cultural development, not divinely inspired. The same imaginary answers are still used today, to my despair. Why is any of the above incorrect? Regardless if good comes from religion or not it is inaccurate and by it's very nature spreads misinformation, leading to things like alienating minorities. I'm not particularily uncomfortable here or I'd probably just leave. Also you don't need to partake of my view, that's kind of ridiculous to suggest. If you're going to cry because I don't like your ideas though you should probably grow up.
I disagree so much with this statement as it is factually incorrect. Allow me to explain And you know this to be factually correct? Your using your own reasoning to draw this conclusion making this an opinion not fact. Not in the slightest, culture and politics lead to alienation of minorities not theism. Also you just verbally assaulted the very large majority of the world calling them savages for believing different then you.
Wow, you're a huge douche bag. Maybe if you didn't treat others so poorly your arguments might be more attractive. You act like your worldview is objectively correct, and it is not.
I'm sorry let me rephrase that, I know that christian god has a 1 out of infinity chance of existing, so I know with that margin of error. Religion IS a cultural attribute. Oh and yes I did. My apologies. Most of the posts against me are like WAAAH YOUR MEAN. So I probably threw you in with the rest.
I got 20 bucks on Retard #1, though I don't know Retard #b has shown to be even more a Retard then usually. Who do you think will win?
