According to the Media (CNN/Fox/MSNBC), there were 200 people at the Chicago Protest

Wait what? I know communists on facebook but not nazis.

Trust me you haven't seen communist until you've seen them, they make Ler seem like a nice happy capitalist.

I was discussing Hoxhaism with a friend a while back actually. I pretty much just said that I figured there weren't any actual Hoxhaists any more outside the internet, and I jokingly compared them to mythical creatures.

My friend then replies, in a pitch perfect impression of Ulfric Stormcloak, "legends don't burn down villages." I was thoroughly amused.

In any case, all the communists on this site are crypto capitalists that must be purged for their bourgeois tendencies, since they do not follow the correct line of Marx-Engels-Lenin-Stalin-Hoxha revolutionary proletarian science.

GLORY TO HOXHAISM, DOWN WITH REVISIONISM . GLORY TO MARX-ENGELS-LENIN-STALIN-HOXHA.

COMRADES, THE GLORIOUS COMRADE STALIN HAS SUMMONED YOU BRAVE MEN TO DEFEND THE MOTHERLAND, *proceed to ammo truck, guy in front of you gets a rifle, you however just get ammo*..

And then its Enemy at the Gates all over again.

Isn't that Call of Duty 1's opening scene?

That as well.

When police use violence: Oh, there just defending the country!
When protestors use violence: BRUTAL THUGS!

I think if you look carefully, its the other way around, and I support black bloc.

When protesters use violence: Oh, they're just defending liberty!
When police use violence: BRUTAL THUGS!

I think if you look carefully, its the other way around.
Surely you know both these arguments have been around far too long for either to be the exact case.
Personally, I think this would've made a good episode of Hill Street Blues. That always looked like it was set in Chicago.

If you noticed, police only use violence after telling the protesters they will use violence about a million times, trying to get them off peacefully, and waiting a long time.

Protestors have no right to use violence, in any circumstance. The police do, and in the .0001% of cases where they don't, everyone jumps on them for it. As well they should, but I find little things more annoying than angsty teens whining about the "5-0" and "police brutality".

Then you deserve what you get. You want to support stupid, illegal bullshit? Then expect consequences: legal and physical, for it.

No one has a right to use violence, except in self defense. The police seem to use violence to get rid of nonviolent and violent protests alike.

If the protesters refuse to leave, after repeated warnings that what they are doing is illegal, and repeated warnings that force will be used if necessary, then they deserve whatever they get (as long as it isnt brutal of course)

What kind of violence isn't brutal?

By brutal I mean sending mass people to the ER and killing people.

My definition of brutal is any kind of use of force on a defenseless or nonviolent person.

Is walking up to a guy and slapping him in the face brutal?

I think so

Pretty brutal

Well if the guy has a spike in his hand then yes.