Total Freedom of Speech is Bad

Uh-oh, we got an elitist up in here!

You guys didn't get my point behind em the dictatorship comparison.

Yes indeed, soviet unions politburo wasn't moronic, Stalin wasn't paranoid, barbaric and a stupid, Lenin wasn't power hungry, brute and a huge cunt thanks be to god that those stupid peasants in Russian civil war never got their democracy, those peasants who rejected the Bolshevik vision of dictatorship of the urban proletariat. Thank god Lenin crushed that rebellion and never allowed peasants making stupid decisions and least we forget, how splendid it was for Germany and the world when Hitler took power. Those foolish plebs can't do anything right, unlike hitler. And do you remember that time when the stupid plebs elected that cunt Abraham Lincoln. What stupid cunts they were.

Democracy isn't perfect, but its the best form of government there is. Also majority of the people don't run the country, you silly. Their representatives do.

"Democracy is the worst form of government besides all those other types" or something like that. I also forget who said it. I feel like it was Churchill but don't quote me on that.

Want share why you feel this way. Because hollow quote doesn't..Really mean anything.

BTW Churchill said after he lost in an election

Not sure if the listener got what I was saying or not.

I don't think he did.

Im not sure. Mosh and the guy with the impeccable name didn't like it so he might've.

I didn't pay attention to your post? I just commented on that absurd statement, that one kid did.

Edit. Yes I got your point

Ok, good.

Oh I was just agreeing with your post. Democracy sometimes doesn't work, but I'd rather live under a democracy than a dictatorship.

I love when people judge a idealogy on the leaders of history, and not the idealogy itself, 'DERP hey this one guy was horrible, maybe all people who follow this idealogy are that way?'


Generalization ftw?

1. You said "Also when you think about it, it is more conveniant to have a dictatorship?" I proved you wrong

2. I didn't answer you, why some ideology is bad, I said why dictatorships aren't a good alternative to democracy

3. Once again I never judged an ideology, I only proved your idiotic statement wrong.

4. If you want, simply yes will do. I can start a rant why for example communism is wrong,disgusting and shouldn't be tolerated and everybody who follow that ideology is either below the age of 20 or mentally handicapped.

1. I never recall saying that I was an Communist supporter but okay.

2. in your post you were bashing the Soviet Union(which was obviously a Communist society) more then arguing your point on to why you think Dictatorship is not a better alternative to Democracy, so yes you were bashing an idealogy(Communism)

3. 'Derp yeah anyone who doesn't follow my idealogy(Democracy) must be a repugnant and horrible human being, because they don't think like I do.'

4. Also replying to a part of your original response to me, a True Democracy is where the people have all the power, so basically it's a dictatorship with a lot more people.

1. Never said you were. Did you even read my original post? I think I made my stance clear. Dictatorships don't work, I used communist and just in case Nazi leaders (so this shit wouldn't happen, but it did, read it again) as an example.

2. hmm I think I made my case why dictatorships aren't a good alternative to democracy. I could if you want use south American dictators as an example. But here's were I am confused you said:"I love when people judge a ideology on the leaders of history, and not the ideology itself " and then you said "in your post you were bashing the Soviet Union(which was obviously a Communist society) more then arguing your point on to why you think Dictatorship is not a better alternative to Democracy, so yes you were bashing an ideology(Communism)" so after all, you do think that leaders do represent their ideology, otherwise how could I bash an ideology in my original post.

3. no... just idiotic human beings

4.no... its an republic, you silly kid. You know? The thing were people elect their representatives and all that.

A Republic and a Democracy are two different things, silly person,


Republic: where people vote in their representatives(as you said), then the reperesentatives make decisions concerning the country they reside in, not a democracy but has a democratic aspect.


Democracy: an form of government in which all the people of a nation together determine public policy, and the laws and actions of their state.


now if you were thinking of an Representative Democracy you would be correct but it's obvious we are both thinking of different democracies, I'm thinking of the Original aspect of Democracy(Athens) while you are thinking of more modern democracies(USA which is actually borderline Republic rather then democracy).

Pulled an idiot move. Read the quote below to see my original post.

Looks like you get pretty sensitive.

I'm in a pissed off mood. Felt like putting somebody else in a pissed off mood. I don't like you people. I guess as a kind of unrelated side effect, it somewhat proves a point, or something.

No it doesn't. No one, or at least I hope no one, is offended by you calling them a "mentally disabled earthworm".