Official In Regards to Kalalification’s Moderator Status

Voting "No" Since everyone is being vague about what Kali has actually done (at least on the 1st and 9th pages) and because I like instilling anarchy in places I don't frequent.

Kali currently above the needed 50% margin by 5%. A little close for comfort for him, I'd say.

So what has Kali supposedly done?

Remember to actually read the thread before you vote. This is about weather or not Kali gets fired, you know.

If he is fired, post the Trump.

Simple solutions are always overlooked.

You think you're late? I was about to say basically the same thing (although obviously i'm less well informed).

Kali is accused of personal insults/hate speech (hate speech only because of how it is worded in the rules, not because people claim he's calling for mass genocide). Mainly based against the Leftists of the forum such as SovietEmpireUSSR, LeninCat, Ler, and otherwise. Also, generally being a douche.

Contrary to the previous stated conjecture, Kali may not have broken the rules officially. But I would like my moderators not to attack my fellow members.
I refer you here. Kali made an official thread talking about how transparency was now beginning to take effect. Which it has, etc. etc. However, rather than simply using this as an alert thread to tell people, he almost immediately uses it to attack his prime enemy in the Corner. Ler.

Ok then, that's interesting information. And of course, it is fair for a mod to state truth, even if against a tribune.

But what he said was entirely false. Ler's post, not only didn't contradict what he previously said. But was deleted for fear of Kali's harassment.

And yet, Kali continued to attack him.

Clearly we can see this as just one example of the extent of Kali's aggression. Perhaps he has not directly attacked us. Perhaps (for now) he has not done something as direct as calling someone a fucking prick. But at what point should we draw the line?

When Kali has backed campaigns that were later found guilty of bribery and corruption, is that the line? When Kali has confessed to hiding insults in his posts, is that the line? When Kali has declared a crusade against elements of the forum, is that the line? Tell me, what is the line?

We can't explain his motives, because there are none apparant to us, and they are not to the benefit of anyone, but otherwise, yes, we can't explain that.

Thank you Mr. Prime Minister

Come now FeyBart, you've spent the whole thread demanding evidence, asking for reasons, calling for an end to this "ridiculousness". Well now you have it. Why have you yet to respond?

In actuality I stand accused of nothing. What Kara deems to have happened is, as usual, far from the truth. As much is evident to anyone who's not irrationally biased to begin with.

Don't blame him for not snapping right into action, I'm pretty sure this 'evidence' has been stated before. I wouldn't conclude it as 'evidence', but accusations that were cited and confirmed, not really much 'evidence'. I do, however, support the idea that Kali should stop being a 'douche', or leave.

Useless conjecture. If things were as they say you are, you'd be picking out line after line of my "far from the truth" argument. Such is what you've do every time you can.

We see far worse things on the forums every day - I think ComradeLer can take being indirectly called 'slimy'.
And if I say 'oh, I think I should delete this post because I know that Karakoran doesn't agree with it and might say something against it which would make me look bad', that is hardly reason to get you into trouble.
Well, that's my opinion at least.

'Cos of course describing Kalalification's ambiguous quasi-insults as attacks is nothing like conjecture.

No. He's just a douche, he didn't break the rules. No offense Kali.

What I don't get is that Kali gets accused of insulting a certain group of people on the forums and creating a thread "mocking their beliefs" while it was created for trolling (which you don't believe), yet the people that accuse him of this are guilty of exactly the same themselves, which isn't exactly fair.

While I don't always agree with how Kali deals with certain situations, and agree with the people who say he could and should be more considerate, the people who accuse him aren't innocent themselves, yet seem to try and put themselves in a victim position.