A Proposal to Appoint a New Moderator

What does that even mean, and how is that supposed to be a response to what D3adtrap said?

It's good to know that, whether or not the idea is good or bad, helpful or destructive, you will be the first one there to complain about it.

That we must take it to the people via a thread before we should even consider putting it up for any form of real legislation. How hypocritical would we be if we tried to force things through without considering what the people wanted?

No problem

Okay, I think that this discussion has reached the end of its life. As the original poster, I am going to request that the thread be locked. There is no more need for debate, it seems as of now that the intentions of the community are plain: the majority of the forum has confidence in the leadership of the moderators as impartial judges, regardless of ideology. A few final words:

To the Mods: Continue to be as impartial as possible, you have done a fantastic job so far. However, I would implore you to be a little more transparent, seeing as the current Tribunes have neglected that part of the job. Still, keep up the good work.

To the Communists: It seems apperent that you are not, at least in the enforcement of the rules, singled out for you ideology. I'd suggest just following the rules to the letter and sticking to you guns in the Coffeehouse.

To the Community: We are all a part of this community. Remember that and we will grow and flourish.

As soon as it's locked I'm re-posting the Op.

Also your completely wrong on your final examination. It seems like you never understood everything from the start.

I don't think the Communists on the forums need a representative for the Communist group of the forums, there are no organized groups which clasify us in such a way. Keep in mind we already have Stalin, and he has a unique colour.