Al Qaida has a nuclear bomb hidden in europe

Discussion in 'The Political/Current Events Coffee House' started by D3adtrap, Apr 27, 2011.

  1. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    Well if we look at numbers 90 000 iraqi civilians died...
  2. pedro3131 Running the Show While the Big Guy's Gone

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,949
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Well let's see, we were in a war with Japan....
  3. CheFlegel New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you not at "War With Terror" ?

    So how is 240 000 civilians dead any more acceptable than only 3000? So why should America get any sympathy at all for 9/11 or the people that died in it? What goes around comes around and America hasn't even reached the tip of the iceberg yet.
  4. C_G Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Wu Tang Province
    Look up the losses for Okinawa. It was a godforsaken peace of land in the Pacific. If the Japs would do that for something that was meaningless, just think about what they would do when an invasion of one of the main islands was launched. It would not have been pretty, and that I can ssure you of. Droping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were entirely necessary.

    Also, if you think about the hundreds of thousands of nukes built in the cold war then try to think about where the fuck you would be able to keep them. I once heard the about a small percentage of Russias WMDs are "unncacounted" for.
  5. battalion New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    270
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Uk Brit-land
    thats easy for you to say without a nuke sitting beneath you
  6. D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap

    It is not. Still people who died in 9/11 deserve sympathy, simply because they had nothing to do with anything. And going to midle east was a fucking stupid.

    I have sympathy for victims of 9/11, but none sympathy for Bush what so ever. He is war criminal (torture) and he broke international law (Illegal invasion) that guy belongs in prison, no he should be executed (US law aprooves this)
  7. BurGroBro Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Question for Che, how should al-Qaeda be given any sympothy for the thousands of people they murderd world wide? Including Americans, Russians, and about 10 times more Muslums?
  8. CheFlegel New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, but "victims" of 9/11 should not either.
  9. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What the hell are you talking about? How can you possibly claim that people who died as a result of a terrorist attack aren't victims?
  10. Galagoth New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    123
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have a feeling he thinks that they are not victims since they lived in the US aka in his eyes are evil beings that must all die
  11. slydessertfox Total War Branch Head

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Message Count:
    11,853
    Likes Received:
    1,425
    Trophy Points:
    373
    Location:
    Mars
    what goes around comes around ........exactly. The Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour, we drop nukes on them. Osame Bin Laden launches okanes into the world trade center, we go shoot him in the head. Yeah What goes around comes around....
  12. CheFlegel New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Japan attacks a military base/port, America nukes a city with a very small military presence.
  13. CoExIsTeNcE LeonTrotsky in Disguse

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    255
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Yup. It's called war dumb-ass. You can look up countless examples of similar cases that do not involve America.
  14. CheFlegel New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Cool so then Al Qaeda had every right to attack the trade centre's and to continue attacking civilians.
  15. Kalalification Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Al Qaeda is not a state. They have no right to declare war.
  16. CheFlegel New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh okay, so you are allowed to kill civilians ONLY if you are a nation. Makes sense... Whatever, keep on keeping on Al Qaeda.
  17. Chelsea366 Retired Moderator

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,865
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Gensokyo
    It's not right to attack civilian targets in any case. I do think that it was wrong for America to nuke those cities but that doesn't mean attacking civilians who had nothing to do with anything is ok.
  18. CoExIsTeNcE LeonTrotsky in Disguse

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,612
    Likes Received:
    255
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    So the US should have gone over to any country harboring Al-Queda members, pick 3000 random civilians and had some burned, some shot, and some thrown off high cliffs. I mean according to your previous statements that would have been fair.
  19. CheFlegel New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Message Count:
    3,439
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's not like I support Al Qaeda, I am just a strong advocate of the lesser of two evils and the enemy of my enemy is my friend. If Al Qaeda keeps attacking America good on them, not only does it damage America but all these wars put America more and more in debt, so yeah Al Qaeda's doing a pretty good job.
  20. LeonTrotsky Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    321
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    And you're doing a pretty good job in making me want to kick your teeth in more. You do understand that I am an American, and basically you're advocating the deaths of Americans, and thus saying that it is not just okay, it is better if I die. To be frank, you're a douche.

Share This Page

Facebook: