Mitt Romney did not won the GOP nomination

Person living in Portugal trying to tell Americans how the American delegate system works...

@crocve
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates
http://projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates
http://www.cbsnews.com/primary-election-results-2012/scorecard.shtml?party=R
Shut the fuck up. Romney already has the 1144 delegates required to win. It is over.

But he will.

Here it is how the delegates are unbound:

How logicall of you...

You people are indirectly helping the corporate estabilishement. You support candidates who constantly change their positions, instead of a candidate who always defends the same principles.

This is not a problem of jewish bankers or some conspiratorial thing: it´s a fight for freedom.

How nice of a person living in Portugal (a person who acts like the Americans who know nothing about their country nonetheless) trying to explain to the Americans who follow america politics and know what is going on that this is a fight for "freedom". Leave the fights for freedom to the people who know what they are fucking talking about thank you very much.

......................
Look, I don't like Mittens, but you should really just accept the facts. Mittens has won. Paul has lost. Boo hoo.

crocive, lets say Ron Paul is elected, would the elite allow him to dismantle there puppet corporate state? They'll lobby him, and if that doesn't work, they'll impeach him, and if that doesn't work, they'll use the courts, and if that doesn't work, they'll kill him.

I don't think they would go that far. This isn't Rome circa 50 BC.

I don't think Paul will get elected.

Well Captain Obvious, thank you for that brilliant statement.

Quite flattering.

Your understanding of the American voting system is limited. It should also be noted that one of your video's was biased, and that countless people have already pointed out Romney has the required delegates. This is good, as my personal opinion is that Ron Paul is, ahem, "nuts". Not that I like Romney or Obama much either.

Or you know, Congress/the Senate could oppose him. After all (and contrary to what most American libertarians think), the US Presidency isn't a completely unopposed dictatorial position. The other branches of government are there for a reason.

But no, Ron Paul Elected = Instant Libertarian Paradise.
/fucking logic

I'm confused, weren't you Portuguese?

Also, WOOOOHOOOO RON PAUL 2012 YEEEAHHH! *flags everywhere*

You people are in denial. You still listen to the lying media. Amazing.

I already showed the proof that all delegates are unbound, and you still say something "oih, you are not american, you don´t know nothing" or "the media says he won". Stupid xenophobic and estabilishement non-sense.

Oh, and recently, the RNC are trying to stop the Ron Paul Festival in Tampa. Then tell me: if Mitt Romney already "won" the primaries, then why do the party is doing anything prejudicial to Ron Paul and his supporters?

What's really amazing is that you blindly follow random ideas floating around on the Internet, and then make wild claims regarding another country's election system which neither you nor those you listen to understand. Ron. Paul. Did. Not. Win. You're confusing losing with media corruption.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html
http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates
http://projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates
http://www.cbsnews.com/primary-election-results-2012/scorecard.shtml?party=R

Begone Paulbot!

Obviously the work of Freemasons and Zionists.

I did not said he won. I said the election of the candidate did not occured yet, and so, Romney still did not won.

And just let me ask on question to see if you people can answer me: how many delegates, for example, Romney won in Nevada?

And the trolling continues.

20 delegates.