The USSR agrees to send economic aid packages to Afghanistan, under the condition that they sign a non aggression pact with us, and that we may build 3 military bases in their country.
South Korea is watching Iran-Israel situation very carefully, South Korea also ergs the great nation of Afghanistan to shed its self from the yoke that is the USSR and join the Pro-NATO side, by doing so trade between are two nations will commence and your culture and people will be respected. South Korea also agrees with France with that status update about Libya.
The French Republic is interested in aquiring allies in trading capacities. Any nation interested my put forth a proposal for consideration by the French Republic.
Afghanistan would like to ask the length of the non-agression pact. Also, construction of 3 militray bases is too much of an demand. Our people are already divided, civil war could be just around the corner, anything to ease the situtaion is welcome. Clearly construction of bases is not in the interest of the people who wish to side with the US and NATO and would simply further strain the country. We ask that you be allowed to build these bases at a later point in time when we are not so divided. Giving us this aid will bring us to that point.
South Korea, MacArthur has been recalled due to a disagreement regarding the direction and purpose of the American role in the conflict.
Soviet intelligence have confirmed that the US attempted to launch (wp) nuclear weapons against North-Korea! Such acts of terror cannot be tolerated! We would like to propose to the security council, that given this blatantly unprofessional barbarism forced upon Korean-people, that UN 'Peacekeeping' forces, pull out of the Korean conflict immediately.
The French Republic would like to give two points of inquiry: 1. Exactly how close-to-reality is this simulation meant to be? 2. Who is on the UNSC's non-permanent list? The French Republic cannot confirm the USSR's allegations. Therefore, the French Republic stresses that all sides exercise restraint and caution. The French Republic further requests that the nations of South Korea, Japan, and China give confirmation of these allegations.
Israel holds no ill will towards the UN, and does not wish for any sort of hostilities. Rather, we were disturbed by Iran's insistence on investigating us, as we believe that their intentions are not benevolent, but rather to gain information over the state of our military. Israel will comply with any UN mandate, but will not give in to Iranian demands, as their lack of reasoning suggest hostility towards our state. Furthermore, Israel would like to invest 1MP into the UP (Union Party for Israel and Palestine), ensuring that they succeed in their fight to unite our two peoples, barring foreign intervention. Also, the PA has successfully taken control of Gaza, but the UP has no presence there. For now, we petition the UN that Israel take control of the Gaza Strip, as the Fatah led PA appears to be incapable of controlling it's own population, and is dealing with UP revolts in the West Bank.
I am sorry USSR but that cannot happen, but we will end the supply for South Korea has claimed what was rightfully theirs. 1) It will probably at first seem very similar... 2) Next week, either wed - Fri Ill randomly select people
South Korea would like to remind the American population of what there fighting for and that is freedom and to liberate the North Korean people from there communist leaders, South Korea would like to remind the American population that MacArther is a symbol of freedom and heroism here in South Korea and how important he is for the victory that much be achieved even if U.S troops presences is required on the battlefield, we will be more then willing to give in to U.S demands like i don't know some navy bases for you guys if you sent in MacArthur and some u.s troops. I would like to remind your nation on how big a blow the loss of North Korea would be to the communist forces and would ruin much of there geopolitical reach into Asia while increasing yours. Oh and don't forget the open influx of cash that would boost your economy.
Any word on UN approval for the occupation of the Gaza Strip? Do we have approval, under the context of protecting the citizens? (((FYI, in this timeline, the Oslo Accords were just recently signed, almost thirty years early, and the PA is just a infant.)))
At no point has the United States attempted to use nuclear weapons against the North Koreans; I reiterate, our own soldiers as well as those of our allies are in Korea. The USSR's allegations are baseless and irrational.
Regarding the Israel-U.N. relations: The French Republic is heartened by Israel's reassurances of friendly relations. At this time, the French Republic is considering abstension from the vote on the matter of the Gaza Strip until such time that we can meet and communicate with the nations of Britain, the USSR, China, and the U.S. in the interests of ensuring the backing of the UNSC.
South korea is outraged by the allegations made against the united states by the USSR and demands an apology. South Korea also voices its support for Israel's occupation of the Gaza strip as long as it protects both Israel and Palestine civilans.
The People's Republic of China announces that it will be too be sending both Humanitarian and, and non-combat volunteers to help in the Korean conflict. (15MPP, 2MP, 5RP to North Korea) (I've been asking Soviet to get on and help, but despite this, he hasn't been active. I don't think we ever stood any chance of winning without him, so under these circumstances, I think it is fair that I assume temporary control of the PRC)
(Uh... no it doesn't. If that held true then I would have assumed control of the PRC rather than that of the French Republic. And you can't be allowed to do that... The game stipulates that there are 3 superpowers vieing for victory... The USSR, the U.S., and China. Giving you control of China would be giving you the game automatically. The massive amount of free resources that you just get to spend taking control of China makes this clear. And short of a nuclear exchange, destroying either the USSR or China would be near impossible, and leave those respocible with the added burden of destroying another state of yours. In an case, this arguement is maddness... Surfusa will make the rules clear... one way or another...)
(Man power is indicative of soldiers and military equipment, not humanitarian volunteers. Hence why it's needed to invade countries.)
