The Soviets didn't side against you, where would you hear such nonsense? The Soviets LOVE(D) you. Anyway, no one attacking you is in the Communist Bloc unless you count the 3 MPP Turkey still has in Iran. Yes it is. We're reclaiming the Holy Land, this isn't raw imperialism like you would pretend it to be.
The PRP thanks Turkey. The Army Parades through Warsaw with the new tanks in the lead. Polish and Turkish flags hang side by side on the tanks.
I'm assuming the Conservatives would have some, even if it wasn't militant. It would be more politically moderate Afghans that would revolt. The point is to reclaim the Holy Land. They're not peaceful. They just fought a war to consolidate their surroundings and they just laid claim to the Golan Heights.
The Soviets warned Yugoslavia against helping me, essentially making them a hostile in my eyes. Also, a Holy War still isn't a appropriate casus beli, nor is it a legal. Also, I didn't fight a war, I supported a revolution in the West Bank.
If the afghan citizens want to revolt because higher ups in an Islamic government made up the bullshit excuse to go to war by calling it a "holy war" (a term that has not been justifiable for centuries) then they are free to go jump in the lake.
No they didn't. In fact Yugoslavia was helping you until they were convinced (by me, I would presume) that you were a traitor. It's an appropriate casus beli. You see, calling it unappropriated would infer that it was for self-gain. But our motives stand not in imperialism and profit, and that is what NATO might never understand. They wouldn't revolt because you didn't attend, they would revolt because you acted against it. This as well.
Britain will hold out on direct intervention in the Mid-East until military action in Italy is resolved for time being we will only be supplying what was formally Israel.
As we speak there are Islamic soldiers storming the IPU's borders, so it will be a debate on whether or not to force the Jihaders out rather than to let them in.
((kara, the Islamic leaders were killed. What would be the justification for going to war with Islamic nations for a Islamic cause, when the current leaders are communists and have a strong interest interest in getting rid of religion? The PDPA is a communist party bro.))
((Again, there wouldn't be a hate against not going. There would be a revolt over going AGAINST the Jihad. Sure some people may not like that your not going, but they'll get over that. It's actually ATTACKING the Jihaders that wont work out. And the government isn't what I'm referring to, they don't matter here. It will be the citizens that will matter.))
The PRP hopes this conflict in the Middle East will be resovled peacefully before blood is shead. The PRP is not overjoyed by the call to Nato yet understands. However the statement about conquering the communist is taken as a threat. The PRP denies any alligation of conspiring to conquering the IPU and assures no socialist in the warsaw pact wished it.
((Actually there is no reason to say that it will not work out as the religious groups in my country have been disappearing Islam has become less and less important in my country daily due to the government getting rid of it. So clearly the government is a factor. ))
To clarify, I call only to NATO because I believed that the Communists were against me, and I still think they might be. However, if the communists assist me, I will end my bid for NATO membership, remain neutral, and renew all partnerships with them.
Is this because your rightfully with the Communists or because you've been told NATO can't spare anything to help you? Didn't you just fight a Civil War to consolidate the Muslim parts?
It's because the Communists have been pretty good to me, but I'm saddened that they abandoned me so fast, and have not intervened against. Also, I didn't fight Civil War, I formed a Union with the Palestinian Rebels who took over the West Bank. Making the IPU at least 50% Muslim, if not predominately so.
