Atheism is (according to Wikipedia) the rejection of religion. And if you reject a religion, you claim that religion is untrue. So again: babies are not atheist, they are just completely unrelated to the conversation. Babies aren't theist, they aren't agnostic, and they aren't atheist: They aren't anything in this topic. You keep claiming that it doesn't exist. See, what you posted here isn't very well thought out, because if you'd use logic, which you are very well capable of, the sentence itself already claims the nonexistence of a god. You post "we dont need to claim the unexistence of things that are not proven". Saying that you don't need to claim something is untrue if it's not proven, already claims that it's untrue. Therefor, the whole sentence is a paradox, making just as much sense as the phrase "Thank God I'm atheist". Oh, what a great effort to undo a good point. You just literally post the same thing again, completely ignoring the counter-argument posted before.
