Republican's: Let's close the EPA!

You've spouted some Green Propaganda basiclly, which is probably what they taught you in school. Turns out, the public High Schools aren't always 100% right. Especially with solely ideological things like this. It's why you also don't listen to the school when they say anything political.

science is politacally driven?

The Green Movement is, at least more than anything else.

I don't know where you got the asumption that was what I said...

well we're talking about environmental science and you said things like this are ideologically driven. so an enitre wing of science is apperentally a plot to cram regulation down our gullets-good to know

No it's true they are not brainwashing us with green science it's true I've seen the same things displayed outside of school and i also guess our education isn't credible to you because were also taught to treat natives equally and the Indian Act is a terrible thing.

well natives were just jews who build boats and sailed to america. they went agianst god's will and he turned then a darker color to relect this sin agianst the lord. so if you think about it kara is really just being anti-semetic and at the same time in the right with god.

More like, it convinced itself of something that was utterly rediculous.
Thus it found or created evidence to support its own arguement and ignored evidence against it. Then we got the Green Movement.

I am now incredibly confused.

like your doing right now?

What evidence against it you have none meanwhile we defeated you with facts about what is happening right now.

it's from the mormon religioun, i know this becuase i live 200ft (about 60 meters for our non-american users) from a mormon church and they try to convert me every month. It's interesting, funny, and annoying all at once

I know Mormonism is very funny isn't it.

[yt:2mmuogqu]tggtPHDmrR8[/yt:2mmuogqu]
everything you need to know about mormonism

Your the one arguing for change and all that to prevent "Global Warming". Where's your evidence?

Also, evidence to say that nothing will happen isn't exactly common. I mean come on, who wants to be the Scientist who gets stuck testing on things to make sure they dont' have reprocussions. Also you havn't even given me a solid ground of what you think will happen, so even if I pulled out Evidence that showed minimal damages you would just that's what you predicted and were right all along.

Well just look Arctic if you want proof and annual temperatures have gone up. Also science proves it because we are steadily throwing CO2 into the atmosphere which which let's the sun's heat in but not out thus creating global warming and since you haven't been to high school yet i won't go farther into deatail.

The slight change in the past 30 years or so is not evidence that we're going to continue going drastically up. But many scientists have simply assumed it will ignoring the limited records of temperature patterns the Earth has.

You just gave me some techno-babble... There's no reason to assume that Human Emissions could possibly melt the Arctic or something. If it was and there was credible evidence to back it, why do you think no one has done jack shit to "stop it"? There's nothing credible about it.

Don't worry, I'm well prepared for your lethal combination of gibberish and you don't understand arguements.

Actually since the 1950s the Arctic has decreased 10%-20% in size. Also to lessen it affects we have made laws limiting CO2 emissions.

Yeah, because the majority of scientists who agree that this is a real threat are all idiots and forced to say that it exists because of green propaganda :roll: You dont know jack shit what you are talking about

How is that techno-babble? That was a pretty simple explanation of how it works, so either you're an idiot or you're being willfully ignorant, which I'm going to assume the latter. "no credible evidence to back it" Now you're really ignoring evidence. Scientists have looked at ice cores in the arctic, and after the start of the industrial revolution, there's higher concentrations of industrial emissions, and then a significant difference is seen after the passing of the clean air act or whatever it's called. This increase in emissions in the atmosphere coincides with the steadily rising global temperature and subsequently the significant reduction of the ice caps, ever wonder why people are so concerned about polar bears? Plus, it's pretty strange how all the credible, respected scientists agree with this, while all the conservatives who work in business think it's a scam. Gee, I wonder which side knows science better?

Can you say nothing but "You don't understand" and "You sicken me"?

As in, that's not at all the theory or what happens.

No, that's not what's going on. The Arctic has melted a little from rising temperature, however, because emissions are always rising this has led to the belief that emissions are causing the temporary rise in temperature. It would be like saying that the Sucidie Rate, which bounces up and down, has been linked to emissions because suicides were going up for a decade or so.

There's actually not credible evidence that the Polar Bears are dying out or something because of the melting. Actually some people have theorized that its actually improved their living conditions. It is used a lot though because Polar Bears are "cute" and cute sells.

They're not usually respected, or credible. I mean, a few are, but it's more a few scientists doing some research and then copy-pasted a million times. I don't know how you managed to bring in bussiness to this, or Conservatives.

Are you fucking kidding me by saying the melting of the ice caps are improving their living conditions. Please just stop right there as I have not heard anything more stupid than that