Rule Reform and Clarity act

Discussion in 'Site Policy and Rule Announcements' started by D3adtrap, Apr 14, 2012.

  • by D3adtrap, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:44 PM
  • D3adtrap www.twitter.com/d3adtrap | Mr. Choc: Coco Fruits

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,188
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    www.Twitter.com/d3adtrap
    I'm proud to present: Rule Reform and Clarity act! When developing this reform goal was to eliminate bureaucracy, clarify layout both for moderating staff and users alike. While it does not change existing rules, it drastically changes and clarifies them allowing significant mobility when dealing with reports and appeals. This also should give user a better idea of their rights & responsibilities as a member of our community.
    (New) Site rules



    Rule Reform and Clarity act

    Posting rules

    Breaking any of the rules will automatically get user warned accordingly regardless of context or user excuses.

    - Posting pornographic links, photos, videos & files is strictly prohibited.

    - Revealing personal information of other member is also strictly prohibited. This includes, but is not limited to: numbers, addresses, pictures...

    - No spamming or flooding. Same comment can be in multiple threads, as long as it is on topic & contributes to conversation. Note that "getting message across" is not an excuse under any circumstances.

    - No user is permitted to have more than one account. Limited exceptions may be made with prior consent of the staff. Non-primary accounts will be banned immediately upon discovery, unless it's one of the previously described exceptions.

    - Discussion of how to pirate copyrighted software, regardless of the source, is strictly prohibited. This includes posting files and/or links to download a copyrighted material.


    Posting guidelines - Introduction

    Breaking posting guidelines will not automatically make user guilty, unlike breaking rules. Staff member can independently judge the situation based on context and other factors if user is guilty of breaking posting guideline and act accordingly. These factors include, but are not limited to: humor, doing harm was intended or not, nature of the thread or comment and so on.

    If user is found guilty & believes that (infraction) was not justified:
    *If no infraction was given, user:
    - can PM a staff member and try and prove that ones post was not breaking guidelines.

    **If infraction was given, user can:
    - PM a staff member and try and prove that ones post was not breaking guidelines.
    - If user is unhappy after PMing staff member he can appeal to staff as a whole and issue an appeal.
    - If user still believes he/she was not breaking the guidelines after two previous steps, one can appeal to JosefVStalin directly.

    Note that this exchange is done privately, between user and the staff. It is not up to a public debate. For more information in regards to appeals scroll down further.


    Posting guidelines - Responsibility of the staff

    Moderators are bound to enforce posting guidelines, are expected to have unbiased and just judgement.


    When an infraction is given moderators have to write a comprehensive message to the user as to what they are being warned for and a source (Posting guidelines) to back up their judgement. Personal note is also accepted if stated in a message.

    If user believes that a staff member acts out of line, one should take it to JosefVStalin.

    Posting guidelines

    - Personal Attacks will not be tolerated. This includes any material which is vulgar, defamatory, libel, harassing, hateful, threatening, invading of others privacy, sexually oriented, racially motivated, or violates any laws. User will be given a warning or a ban, temporary or permanent, depending on severity if you violate this policy. ***Note that one can be warned for breaking this rule only if report is made by user(s) it was targeted at***

    - Sexually offensive, sexually explicit material. This includes suggestive images, graphics, and comments.

    - While political speech is generally tolerated, there are certain limits towards what is considered political, and what is considered hateful. The site recognizes hate speech as:
    *Speech that carries no meaning other then the expression of hatred for some group, such as a particular race, esp. in circumstances in which the communication is likely to provoke violence.

    **Further, genocidal comments, defined as "expressing the desire to cause serious physical and mental harm with the intent to destroy, partially or entirely a group of people" will not be tolerated.

    **Groups include, but are not limited to

    - Race

    - National origin

    - Gender

    - Sexual Orientation

    - Religion
    - Political view

    - Any post that causes script errors by entering any type of code in a message post.

    - Any links or codes that causes harm or attempts to cause harm to another users computer.

    - Do not post more than once consecutively, if you forgot to add something in your original post, use the edit post feature.

    - Do not dig up old threads. If you want to continue an old discussion (older than six months), create a new thread and reference the old one in your post.


    Infractions

    NKVD uses a tiered infraction system with the corresponding point values as follows:


    *1st Tier offenses (1 Point)

    -Insulting another user

    - Reusing a signature/avatar after staff had previously removed it

    - Double posting

    - Necroposting

    **2nd Tier offenses (2 Points)

    -Insulting another member after being previously infracted

    -Inappropriate Material

    -Posting of another users private information without the expressed consent of that user

    -Piracy

    -Hate speech

    -Multiple accounts - One Week Ban

    **3rd Tier offenses

    - Malicious Content

    - Spamming

    -Third tier offenses will result in instant and permanent bans

    -Third tier offenses are only appealable if the user can show evidence that his account had been hacked and the actions taken were not his.


    Banning
    *The accumulation of 3 points in a one month time period, will result in a 7 day ban

    -Upon completion of initial ban, users will remain at three points for exactly 30 days unless further infractions are given

    -Users who are infracted within the first 30 days after coming out of a ban will be given a 1 month ban

    -Users who are infracted in the 30 days following this 2nd ban will be permanently banned

    -All non routine bans pend JosefVStalin's approval before enacted

    **Users in good standing who have been infracted will lose points at a rate of one per month

    Appeals - Infraction
    In order to insure users are given a fair experience, users who have been infracted by a staff member have the right to appeal their decision.

    - Appeals will be heard in a timely manner, and involvement will be limited to the plaintiff, infracting staff member, and a third party staff member.

    - Appeals will take both parties arguments into consideration with regard to the site rules, and applicable ruling precedents.

    - Appeals will take place via private messaging unless otherwise designated.

    - Once the Appeal is complete, the decision cannot be further appealed, and the decision is final.

    - Appeals are not up for a public debate


    Appeals - Bans

    Most bans will now come directly from JosefVStalin unless
    • The ban is Routine against a Spambot, Multi-account etc.
    • The ban is required in order to stop a user spamming, posting malicious content etc.
    therefore, appeals for all bans must go directly through Stalin, this can be done by emailing him at:comradestalin1@gmail.com, contacting him via Skype or other means.



    Updatelog
    Unit779 likes this.

Comments

Discussion in 'Site Policy and Rule Announcements' started by D3adtrap, Apr 14, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Karakoran
    Did you read what I said? If you did screw up once or twice and got a month ban you could be consciously decided that you want to fix yourself up. If you spent 29 days being good yet on the 30th day accidentally double posted you'd have earned a perma ban. Don't you think that's a bit excessive? Sure the ideal behind the rule reform, to stop evasion that plagued us in the past, is good; it has also instituted a lot of draconian elements. Personally, I think this forum would be better off without them.

    And I know Sly or someone like him will have something snappy to say amounting to the extent of, "These are the rules now, fuck off." I bet you sure think you're clever, then.
  2. JosefVStalin
    This is fear mongering, no one is going to be banned for double posting. If anyone believes they were unfairly banned they can always talk to me and I'll overturn it.
  3. Karakoran

    Other than that, I don't think the act where well clarifies if there are exceptions made for reasons not stated in the rules.

    Most forums are run by a bunch of asshole admins and mods that wont listen to anything you say no matter how wrong they are. I don't think any of the forum goers really want this to be another forum. That's why we're members of this one.
    You Rang? likes this.
  4. JosefVStalin
    We haven't ever permanently banned a user for double posting and it's not going to start now. If you actually read the rules you'll notice that all bans which aren't mutli accounts or spams bots are administered by me and I can tell you out right that I would never perma ban a member for double posting or necroposting.
  5. Chelsea366
    Of course not perma bans but if the option is not there for at least a small ban for breaking any rule many times despite infractions and warnings then there is no point in them following that rule.
  6. JosefVStalin
    Of course, but I don't intend to ban some one permanently for double posting.
  7. Chelsea366
    Indeed, I would never suggest that. Even in the previous system where we handled bans no-one would have been banned permanently for something so minor. I was just trying to clarify.
  8. DukeofAwesome
    So about that, "Moderators do not have to give any reason if they decide to...lock or unlock a thread." What would be so bad about them stating a reason?
  9. esac1122
    It could be a dumb reason
    The Shaw likes this.
  10. Kali
    The only time I deleted posts was in accordance with the Coffeehouse posting guidelines, and for spam bots. I don't understand how you can possibly STILL be butthurt about your two paragraph, error-ridden mess of a post getting deleted for breaking the posting rules.
    The Shaw and Unillogical like this.
  11. yuri2045
    When you did that I thought it was a forum bug, lol.
  12. Echo
    Sorry,too long
  13. General Mosh
    Technically he could report you for that because that is a personal insult in regards to his sexual orientation. Or, you know, you could stop being immature and acting like your posting on youtube.
  14. BattalionOfRed
    Holy fuck, you broke my alerts.

    Anyway, I've no clue what the word means, although if it is an insult I will be all means do so, he has used it against me many times to dodge the subject. He seems to think that has some sort of meaning to me specifically, which is silly. Just leave it alone, it's fine.
  15. General Mosh
    It implies you are homosexual, as it implies you are taking something "up the ass" which makes you "butthurt". In other words its a completely childish and immature insult that only someone like Kali would use to try and insult someone. By the way @Kali, butthurt isn't a word, I'm surprised a grammar nazi like yourself would use it.
  16. BattalionOfRed
    Hmm, not something I'd recommend be said again.
  17. General Mosh
    What is?
  18. BattalionOfRed
    The word you've explained not half an hour ago.
  19. General Mosh
    Oh I was unsure what you were referring to. Yes I agree with your recommendation. Its immature and unnecessary, especially coming from someone who disregards people for being "immature red teenagers"
  20. Karakoran
    No it means you're in a childish fit about something that doesn't matter, at least in this context.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Facebook: