Tribune nominations 1

Discussion in 'Archive' started by JosefVStalin, Jul 8, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Toast Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    630
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Sierra Leone
    Grow up, you two.
  2. C_G Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Message Count:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Wu Tang Province
    Isn't that technically a ban worthy offence? Age discrimination?
  3. Chelsea366 Retired Moderator

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,865
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Gensokyo
    Isn't that technically a ban worthy offence? Age discrimination?[/quote:9be4pc7r]
    No, it's not.
  4. Link NO SWAG

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,515
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    134
    Location:
    Koprulu Sector
    Isn't that technically a ban worthy offence? Age discrimination?[/quote:c3ypf0o3]
    "a. Speech that carries no meaning other then the expression of hatred for some group, such as a particular race, esp. in circumstances in which the communication is likely to provoke violence."
  5. Karakoran Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,903
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    It technically is against the rules.
  6. Chelsea366 Retired Moderator

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,865
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Gensokyo
    He said ban worthy. To me that means outright ban.
  7. Karakoran Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,903
    Likes Received:
    640
    Trophy Points:
    193
    Location:
    Tucson, Arizona, USA
    Well Chelsea, technically calling for the genocide of peoples because they're not of your superior race isn't banable either.

    In fact only spam and "malicious content" is an instant ban. Which is weird. You can be perma banned for spam, but not posting other people's information.
  8. Chelsea366 Retired Moderator

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,865
    Likes Received:
    1,923
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Gensokyo
    I was saying it wasn't ban worthy. What was your point? You aren't perma banned for normal spam, stuff like what spam bots do and extreme spam will get you banned.
  9. 0bserver92 Grand King of Moderation

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Message Count:
    6,746
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Canada
    You can begin the campaign phase now.
    The Candidates are Demondaze, Link, ComradeLer, JayJayGT, and Ronald Raygun. Good Luck.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Facebook: