WAS STALIN JUST A FORCE FOR EVIL??

Off topic but: What are your opinions on the following.....Homosexuality, Capitalist, Communist, Jews, Germans, the French, Gaddafi, Rebels, Jewish homosexuals, and finally a piece of toast.

Nice a good topic . Homesexulas i have nothing against nor should any one not that i am gay my self that is. Capitalists i hate but its hard to as i and you are capitalists. Communists, i would like to say i am one but i cant really say i am as i live in a society where communism ist an option. Jews i have nothing against as no one should. Germans i also have nothing wrong with as modern day Germans shouldt be blamed for the war. French are fine if not a bit weird. Jewish homosexuals are fine if they exist because if you are truly Jewish are you allowed to be gay? and toast is something i wipe my ass with. Gaddafia is a mad dog but he was brutly murded and i dodt believe in an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth. and the rebels i had great faith in till n.a.t.o stept in.

This thread man.... This thread.....

That may be true. But now they're all a bunch of raw milk drinking, Alex Jones loving, gold worshiping, anti-government-for-the-sake-of-being-anti-government fags.

R.I.P classical libertarians.

This is getting pretty fucking annoying. You hate Stalin and you hate Americans and NATO. You are possibly the first person I have ever seen that hates BOTH. Why was it so bad that NATO stepped in? They only helped the rebels overthrow a bloodthirsty tyrant oppressing his own people. How can NATO stepping in automatically turn you against the rebels? Oh wait I see now because you are won of those people that automatically hates anything pro-west or pro-american even if it is for the better.

Also....

You and Viking have to learn how to fucking spell and use proper punctuation. You both live in ENGLISH speaking countries. I and other members of this forum would not care too much if it was a few words here or there but every other word (especially for J.F.K) is fucking misspelled. It is not that hard to use freaking spell check.

Those are Americans. We already have coins. I put a coin in my japseye once.

Maybe I misunderstood what you meant by libertarian. Also ow.

Lazy. why do you care any way you can understand cant you stop getting so fucking upset by it. and yes anything that has a sniff of america on it turns to shit.

A bloodthirsty tyrant what was he Vlad the fucking impaler. No quite alot of people actually liked Gaddafi however he is dead now and its up to the Libyan people to decided there future. NATO and the U.N overstepped there boundaries in meddling in the affairs of other countries, although one can tell that had they not then Gaddafi would have won the war and possible committed a genocide against the people of Benghazi. Am I for the intervention, Not really but in the end the ends justified the means. Although I find it so hypocritical that where willing to use force to bring down Gaddafi but not Al-Assad. Next not all pro-western things are great and amazing although im not one of those "WELL IF ITS WESTERN IT SUCKS" type of people, i kinda like both insights.

Mine aren't as bad as his and mostly there just unorganized and unstructured. Writing and Grammar is not my strong suit and I admit that.

To be honest my grammar on the forum got worse when Kali stopped doing his crusades, but hey at least mine is understandable. His is umm uhh yeah.

Isn't this thread totally infringing the posting guidelines for the Coffeehouse?? If so I call this a closed thread already.

Wait a second when the fuck did this hit 7 pages. And how the fuck did that happen.

I agree this thread has nothing to do with the original topic. start talking about Stalin!

By posting guidelines he means that nobody is using periods (and thus not writing in full sentences) which is against the rules and the grammar is so bad it breaks the coffeehouse guidelines. If you are too lazy to use fucking spell check then maybe you should not be posting here.

Ah i thought it was because it got off topic.

Stalin did do a lot of bad for his country, but there was good in some of what he did. He led the Red Army to victory against the much worse Nazis, and industrialized the Soviet Union. Without those things the USSR would never have lasted as long as it did. In the mists of all of this some innocent people were killed. In the end Stalin may have been a bad man, but without him the USSR would never have lasted.

The question i have is this? Was the effects of Stalin so permanent and his implications and actions to and for the soviet union make it so that destalinization was one of the leading factors of the collapse of the soviet system. So what is everyone thought on destalinization.

A little more than some were killed....

27......more like 10-20 million give or take from this range. Although we may never know.