Why should you vote Ler? (ComradeLer's Campaign Thread)

Hmm. You just gave me some more to think about. I'm getting some ideas. Let me contemplate this for a moment, I will get back to you about it.

Cmon guys the mods arent all bad

*entire forums breaks out in laughter

well observer, kali and pedro are fine in my opinion

No I'm just questioning the candidate.

The mods are good, the forum members are just whiny.

The mods are good, the forum members are just whiny.[/quote:1jn5d2d0]
the mods are to nice, we are spoiled brats with 1st world issues. (im not complaining)

I like the mods- a society need order and they provide us with that. It's not like they're mean about it or anything. I like most of them exept for unilogical because he doesnt post a whole lot so I can't form an opinion about him.

I also don't get why people hate Chelsea. She's nice and works hard, yet everybody acts like she's a Succubus or something.

I just don't get the time. I tend to make sure a get through suggestions/maintenance to deal with any issues.

I just like that you know when your mentioned. It's like you have sort of superpower

Ok, observer, what do you think about this -

7. I will support my idea of a re-structured system of rules. My basis of thinking behind this is that the current system is flawed. My idea involves instituting a new system of points. Each person would start off with 5 points. One point is restored once every fortnight. Committing an offense will detract a point from the person, depending on the nature of the offense. Every point decrease will result in a warning from a moderator.
When the points reach 0, it will result in a ban. For a one month period after receiving a ban, the person is capped at either two or three points.
The tier structure would be either abolished, in favour of individual point-levels for each offense, or have their point distribution changed, as to better accommodate this system.

____________________

I believe it is a fact that a person is more likely to be cautious when losing points, rather than gaining them. I think that losing points would be a great deterrent, anyway.

Minus observer and add deadtrap.

WOW I came in here expecting some Che style thing but Ive got to say im really impressed. You've just won my vote sir!

You make a lot of promises, Ler. Let's see if you can keep them. Most of that speech was just filler.

So once every to weeks I just break a rule and get off Scott free. The point system would not have to be abolished (unless you really hate it for some reason) just change it so tier one violation is 1 point, tier 2 is 3 points and tier 3 is 5 points.

Your vote should wait till all candidates to say their platform.

Every election speech is fundamentally the same in the end. You want to show people why they should vote you, what you can bring to office, and how electing you will benefit them. It doesn't matter how you do it, or what you say. And, I believe my goals are rather simple, and well within the realm of possibility to achieve. That is why I chose them.

Mabye I want to vote for Comrade Ler?

Thank you for your support, man.
Awesome sig by the way.

You Gotz meh vote.