I think he is talking about pretty much the act of murdering the groups that are acting up like the romans use to do
thats not a wasteland, the romans were very acceptive of other cultures and religions. They bought civilization to all the lands they conquered, far from a wasteland. I think he was thinking of FNV romans.
perhaps, yet they didn't in the long run think any race as needing to be completely exterminated or enslaved as the more recent fascists 9Nazis and so on) did.
Nazism is different then Fascism. Nazism is Fascism + Racism. Mussolini and Franco are really the only good examples of Fascism in the 20th century.
Franco might have been a Fascist but not really a corporatist. There was also Juan Peron of Argentina and Oliviar Salazar of Portugal amongst them.
Too achive world peace you have to use violence...so you'll end up having to take over most of the world then find out how your gonna keep them from revolting...but by then the world would be destroyed
When world markets are interconnected they will be less and less likely to use war as a means of settling conflict because it will disturb economic prosperity and everyone who benefits from better economies.
How else will you get world peace? Even now its impossible too many diffrent veiws people would never get along under peace..there will be one nation always trying to break away and to bring them to peace you think deplomacy will work...no you have to use force to show everyone else why..
How else will you get world peace? Even now its impossible too many diffrent veiws people would never get along under peace..there will be one nation always trying to break away and to bring them to peace you think deplomacy will work...no you have to use force to show everyone else why..
If the government does not have too much responsibility private services can establish in their place and satisfy a diversity of needs, which would prevent a conflict of unity because they wouldn't have to fight for control over one system.
